Search Results

Stirling issues warning to Washington DC about the collateral damage of deepening economic ties with Uzbekistan Washington, D.C. – May 28, 2026 – Radha Stirling, founder of Detained in Dubai and CEO of Due Process International, is preparing a report for Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) providing frontline case evidence and assistance relating to S.Res. 631.. Stirling is internationally recognised for her work on INTERPOL abuse, politically motivated extraditions, transnational repression, and arbitrary detention. Introduced by Senator Kaine on March 10, 2026, S.Res. 631 calls for a comprehensive State Department report on Uzbekistan’s human rights practices pursuant to Section 502B(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act. The resolution seeks detailed information concerning arbitrary detention, due process violations, torture risks, the treatment of individuals who are deported or extradited to Uzbekistan, and the broader implications for continued U.S. security assistance and cooperation. In her correspondence to Senator Kaine, Stirling outlined her organisation’s direct involvement in numerous Uzbekistan-related matters involving politically motivated allegations, fabricated or unsubstantiated criminal accusations, misuse of INTERPOL Red Notices and Diffusions, coercive financial demands, and serious risks of arbitrary detention and mistreatment upon return. Stirling also highlighted what she described as an increasingly concerning pattern in which the United Arab Emirates is being used as a rapid transit jurisdiction for arrests and extraditions connected to Uzbek requests, often raising serious concerns regarding judicial oversight, access to legal remedies, and compliance with international due process safeguards. “We are currently supporting a British citizen who became subject to INTERPOL measures on the basis of minimal and untested allegations, simply because he worked for a company connected to a wider dispute,” said Stirling. “He was arrested abroad and threatened with extradition while substantial financial demands were made in exchange for resolving the matter. Unfortunately, these patterns are not isolated incidents.” “We have also documented cases in which individuals have been detained or extradited from the UAE to Uzbekistan under circumstances that raise profound concerns about due process, judicial independence, asset seizure, and the risk of torture or coercive treatment following return,” she added. Stirling referenced the recent case of a businessman extradited from the UAE to Uzbekistan without adequate procedural safeguards, where serious concerns remain regarding his treatment and legal protections. Due Process International has assisted multiple individuals and companies in challenging abusive INTERPOL notices, resisting politically motivated extradition proceedings, and securing releases from detention. “As someone who has worked extensively on regional issues for nearly two decades, I believe our frontline experience will provide valuable and concrete evidence to support the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s oversight responsibilities,” Stirling said. “As geopolitical, security, and economic alliances deepen, American, British, and other foreign nationals operating internationally will face increased exposure to politically motivated INTERPOL measures, arbitrary detention, coercive extradition practices, human rights violations, and reputational targeting arising from cross border commercial or political disputes.” Stirling confirmed that supporting documentation and evidence drawn from multiple active matters have been offered to Senate staff to assist ongoing review and reporting efforts connected to S.Res. 631. The outreach comes at a significant moment as Uzbekistan continues pursuing expanded economic, diplomatic, and security relationships with the United States and Western allies. Stirling’s letter stresses the importance of rigorous human rights oversight and warns that systemic concerns surrounding INTERPOL abuse, coercive prosecutions, and extrajudicial extraditions through third countries must be carefully examined before deeper cooperation is advanced. Due Process International and IPEX Reform have been involved in numerous cases concerning alleged INTERPOL abuse, politically motivated prosecutions, extradition disputes, and transnational repression, including matters involving Central Asia and the UAE. Stirling’s correspondence underscores the importance of congressional oversight in ensuring that international security partnerships remain consistent with fundamental principles of due process, accountability, and the rule of law. Radha Stirling CEO at Detained in Dubai CEO at Due Process International +44 7 309 114 195

UAE's mass cybercrime arrests and desperate struggle to manage Dubai's reputation UAE Cybercrime Crackdown Escalates Following Iran War in the Gulf - By Radha Stirling , Expert Witness, Crisis Manager and Founder of   Detained in Dubai .   29 March 2026 Cybercrime Laws In Depth  - A background report by Detained in Dubai UAE's mass cybercrime arrests and desperate struggle to manage Dubai's reputation Since the outbreak of the Iran war in the Gulf, the United Arab Emirates has implemented an extensive cybercrime enforcement campaign targeting individuals who filmed, shared, or discussed events linked to missile and drone activity. What began as public warnings has rapidly escalated into widespread arrests, detention, and prosecution of residents, tourists, workers, and students of multiple nationalities. We have received reports of more than 100 individuals currently in detention. Police sources have confirmed additional cases, corroborated by multiple independent accounts. While the exact figure remains unclear, the true number is likely to be in the several hundreds. More concerning is the increasing classification of these cases under national security frameworks , exposing individuals to severe penalties, prolonged detention, and significantly reduced access to due process. A Pattern of Enforcement Across dozens of cases reviewed, a consistent pattern has emerged: Individuals are being detained merely for taking photos or videos, even where the material was not shared or published. Private messages to family and friends are triggering arrests. Forwarding or interacting with content can result in detention, even where the individual did not create it. In some cases, simply receiving an image and failing to delete it has reportedly led to arrest. Cybercrime cases are being escalated to national security authorities in Abu Dhabi. Many individuals were unaware their actions were prohibited, with numerous cases relating to incidents that occurred before widespread warnings were issued. Enforcement appears inconsistent and, in some cases, arbitrary, with similar conduct resulting in different outcomes. Police are reportedly approaching individuals in public spaces and requesting access to their phones, with arrests made where relevant images or videos are found. Following incidents such as drone strikes, missile activity, explosions, or fires, authorities are reportedly identifying individuals present in the area, compiling lists, and approaching them days later for questioning and device inspection, in some cases up to nine days after the event. They're hunting them down. What Families and Detainees Are Telling Us Families are describing fear, confusion, and desperation. “We just found out his case has been moved to national security. We are shocked. Why?” “He hasn’t done anything wrong. He didn’t even know it was prohibited.” “He hasn’t seen a lawyer. He didn’t know his hearing date.” “He is sleeping on the floor. He is sick. He has no money, no food.” “Please help my brother. He is suffering.” “They opened a criminal case and now I’m really scared.” “I didn’t have any bad intentions. I only shared it privately with friends.” “Our son has been detained since early March.” “He shared a video in a private work group to ask if it was safe to go to work.” “He is being held with around 60 others. No lawyer. No consulate.” “We have had just one phone call. No visitation.” “We are devastated. We are desperate.” “He is a student. He just forwarded a few videos in our family group.” “He didn’t make the videos.” “They checked his phone and took him.” “Please help him.” These accounts are consistent across nationalities and cases. Case Studies: Ordinary Actions, Severe Consequences A British man in his 60s was charged alongside 20 others under cybercrime laws in connection with missile-related footage, demonstrating that tourists are being directly affected. Canadian, Russian, and German nationals were arrested after privately sending a photo of a drone strike on their own residence  to family members to confirm they were safe. A 20-year-old French resident was detained after sending a video to his parents. Reports indicate multiple French nationals have been arrested with at least 12 having been bailed and 2 allowed to leave the country, highlighting disparities in outcomes even where the charges have been the same. A British airline employee was detained when, upon arriving at DXB, he shared a photo of the airport with a private group of colleagues to ask whether it was safe to walk through the airport. Detained in Dubai has contacted his MP, Ms Oppong-Assare for support. A Filipina domestic worker was arrested after taking a photo while waiting to begin work. Her family are very worried for her safety, particularly given that Filipina maids are not a priority for diplomats, the UAE government or the international media. An Indian university student was detained for forwarding videos within a family group. He did not create the content but was arrested while strolling the Palm. A Vietnamese seafarer was arrested upon arrival in Dubai for photos taken outside UAE jurisdiction. A Russian tourist shared footage privately, believing only public posting was restricted. He was detained and his devices seized. A man who filmed a fire in a car park was escalated to State Security. His family report denial of medication, lack of food, and severe detention conditions. Detention: Conditions and Concerns Accounts from detainees describe Overcrowded cells, with 50–60 detainees in shared spaces. Sleep deprivation, in some cases exceeding 48 hours. Individuals required to sign statements in Arabic on a tablet· Limited access to food, medical care, and communication. Lawyers refusing to represent cases under ‘national security’ framework. Embassies given restricted access or outright denied. Scale of Arrests While official figures reference smaller groups, multiple reports indicate: Clusters of 20+. Groups of 35, 45 and 60 people detained. Additional unreported cases across emirates. Based on consistent evidence, the number of affected individuals is likely in the hundreds. Legal Escalation: From Cybercrime to National Security According to top law firms, most cases are being escalated beyond standard cybercrime provisions. Under national security frameworks, individuals may face: 5 to 15 years imprisonment, or potentially life sentences. Fines reaching approximately USD 500,000. Prolonged or indefinite pre-trial detention. Restricted access to lawyers, embassies, and evidence. Human rights violations and torture. This represents a significant shift in legal exposure, from up to 2 years in prison to indefinite detention at the whim of the authorities.  We have received a report that 15 people, including a British citizen, were beaten by police in detention. The Chilling Effect A wider impact is now evident. People are increasingly afraid to communicate, send messages, document events or share information or a news article, even privately. Many are choosing to remain silent, unsure whether even routine communication could expose them to criminal liability and unsure to what extent authorities are surveilling the population. At the same time, ·media coverage has become noticeably restrained,  public discourse is limited and influencers are closely aligned with official messaging.  There is a visible and sudden influx of pro-Dubai accounts with few followers deployed by the government to address negative content on social and news media sites.  Part of Iran's war is to destroy public confidence in the UAE. Information warfare is part of any conflict.  If the UAE stopped targeting expats and tourists, it would stop playing into Iran's hands. The UAE has invested heavily in cultivating a global image through influencer marketing and state-supported initiatives, including training and coordination programmes designed to shape online narratives. Those who promote the country and align with official messaging appear to operate with a degree of protection, while ordinary residents and visitors who deviate, even unintentionally, face severe consequences. This creates a stark imbalance where positive narratives are amplified and rewarded while uncontrolled or unsanctioned content is penalised and silenced. This is not new. Celebrities and influencers have long been used to promote the UAE while being shielded from the legal realities faced by others. For example, Ricky Martin publicly promoted Dubai despite laws that criminalise homosexuality, at a time when individuals were jailed simply for being gay. There is growing concern that individuals are being encouraged to visit and invest in the UAE through highly curated portrayals of safety and opportunity, without being adequately informed of the physical and legal risks.  Influencers and government operated social media accounts are trying to counter the official travel advice from foreign governments that are warning citizens to avoid all travel to the UAE, including transit.  They are warning people to leave now before it's too late.   Dubai supporters are contrasting that advice by claiming it is still safe and "there is nowhere else I'd rather be". Historically, this imbalance has been evident. High-profile figures and celebrities have promoted the UAE internationally while being insulated from the legal consequences that ordinary individuals could face for similar conduct. This raises serious questions about transparency, informed consent for travellers and the responsibility of both governments and corporate partners. Airlines, tourism bodies, and international partners continue to promote the UAE as a safe destination, yet there is little evidence of meaningful efforts to communicate the extent of legal exposure individuals may face. The result is an environment where the image of safety is carefully maintained while the reality of risk is not clearly communicated. The UAE's Coordinated Astroturfing and Online Reputation Defence Campaigns If high profile influencers wasn't enough: During the March 2026 escalation of regional tensions, including Iranian missile and drone strikes affecting Gulf airspace and prompting international travel warnings (such as Australian government advice to leave or avoid transit through the UAE), a noticeable surge occurred in defensive online activity on platforms like X and under news articles. Low-follower accounts, often with default avatars, minimal organic history, or recently activated profiles flooded comment sections with repetitive dismissals of negative coverage. Common tactics included blunt claims of “fake news,” “I live here and everything is normal,” accusations of selective pessimism or jealousy, conspiracy framing (e.g., “Zionists and Ikhwani”), or downplaying impacts by citing population size or isolated examples like store openings. These accounts typically exhibit little to no unrelated personal content and activate in tight clusters precisely when stories highlight empty malls, tourist exodus, hospitality layoffs, flight disruptions, or economic risks. This pattern aligns with organised reputation-management efforts rather than spontaneous grassroots responses. While many appear to be real individuals typing the comments (varied phrasing and occasional local knowledge), the volume, timing, and disproportionate focus suggest coordination through PR agencies or outsourced teams, a tactic observed in past Gulf image-management campaigns. This pushback operates alongside stricter regulatory controls on content creators. Effective February 2026, the UAE Media Council made an Advertiser Permit mandatory for influencers and anyone posting promotional (paid or unpaid) content online. Permit holders must comply with 20 mandatory content standards, display their permit number publicly, and avoid material that could harm “national unity,” public security, or the economy. Violations risk permit revocation, fines, or legal action. Many of Dubai’s estimated 50,000 influencers, who often hold Golden Visas or rely on tourism/real-estate ties, have strong incentives to align with positive narratives during crises. Complementing influencer oversight are aggressive cybercrime enforcement measures. UAE law (including Federal Decree-Law No. 34 of 2021 and Article 52 on rumours) criminalises the publication or sharing of “false news, rumours or provocative propaganda” that may incite panic, disturb public security, or harm the economy with penalties of one to two years’ imprisonment and fines from AED 100,000 to 200,000, escalating during crises. In March 2026 alone, authorities charged  individuals for filming or sharing footage and commentary related to the strikes, with warnings issued against content contradicting official statements. Dubai Media Office and police publicly urged residents to “sidestep rumours” and rely solely on verified government sources, framing negative reporting as potentially illegal. Together, permit-driven influencer self-censorship, direct cybercrime threats, and coordinated low credibility comment campaigns create a multi-layered system designed to suppress dissenting narratives and manufacture the appearance of consensus that “life continues as usual.” While protecting the UAE’s critical tourism and investment image (which accounts for a significant portion of GDP), such measures risk chilling legitimate discussion of verifiable risks, including government travel advisories and observable economic impacts. Economic and Social Impact The perception of safety in the UAE has been affected by: Regional conflict. Legal uncertainty. Aggressive enforcement. A growing perc ​ eption of increasingly authoritarian and unpredictable governance. The impact extends beyond tourism and is affecting multiple sectors: Tourism and hospitality, impacted by declining perception of both physical safety and legal risk. Aviation and transport, facing operation ​ al, safety, and workforce challenges. Media, marketing, and influencer sectors, increasingly constrained and self-censoring. Corporate and multinational operations, navigating legal exposure and staff safety obligations. Foreign direct investment, deterred by regulatory unpredictability and regional instability. Events and exhibitions, experiencing reduced attendance amid safety and legal concerns. Maritime and logistics, exposed to both security threats and cross-border enforcement risks.  Lengthy shipment delays are being reported by staff at the ports which is creating a supply chain challenge. The current environment is creating a dual risk landscape, where both physical safety concerns and legal uncertainty are influencing behaviour across multiple sectors. While long-term recovery is likely, the short to mid-term impact and knock-on effects are likely to be significant.  Even if the UAE stabilises quickly at a national level, the consequences for individuals, investors, and business owners will be far more severe. We have seen this before. During previous economic crises, foreign nationals were disproportionately targeted through the legal system, with aggressive debt enforcement, asset seizures, and criminal complaints used to recover losses. There are numerous documented cases where individuals lost their businesses, assets, and freedom through what can only be described as coercive and exploitative practices. These actions were not limited to private actors. In many cases, banks and state mechanisms were directly involved in pursuing foreign nationals under financial pressure. See the case of  Ryan Cornellius  who remains in prison after his business and assets were looted: There is a real and justified concern that similar patterns will emerge again, particularly as economic strain increases. The laws haven’t changed to afford protections and this kind of abuse has continued over the past decade.  We expect it to increase in prevalence following the Iran conflict. Trapped in Crisis: Travel Bans Many individuals remain unable to leave the UAE due to civil-related travel bans. These cases: Are often non-criminal. Predate the current crisis. Lead to homelessness as their employment visas can’t be renewed. Are a death sentence as for the late veteran, Robin Berlin  who died trying to flee the desert. Despite this, individuals are unable to exit, exposed to ongoing regional risks, at daily risk of dying in a drone attack or explosion and living in fear, often while caring for young children There are increasing calls to lift or suspend non-serious travel bans and allow individuals the choice to leave safely. It’s important to note that UAE civil claims can be enforced internationally in most jurisdictions with the UK even having a mutual enforcement treaty that allows banks and claimants to recover funds abroad. The UAE banks have also used the Interpol Red Notice system  to have debtors jailed abroad, often for low amounts like $5,000. Legal Reality People are being exposed to serious criminal liability for actions they did not understand to be prohibited and have been arrested for: Filming or photographing incidents, whether or not the material is shared. Sharing content publicly or privately. Forwarding or redistributing material, including content they did not create. Communicating privately via messaging platforms. Commenting on or interacting with content online. Sharing or commenting on news articles or posts. Expressing opinions that may be considered critical, negative, or contrary to official narratives. Publishing or circulating information deemed to be false, misleading, or unverified. Disseminating content considered harmful to public order, state security, or the reputation of the state. Content that may be interpreted as inciting fear, panic, or public disorder. Almost anything can be deemed unlawful under these vague and oppressive laws. Authorities are afforded broad discretion in how they interpret and enforce them. What is particularly concerning is that enforcement is extending beyond public activity to private communication and even conduct outside the UAE. Anyone who has potentially committed any of the above acts before visiting the UAE, can be arrested for the next five years under these extraterritorial laws”.  We have seen it in previous cases like that of Laleh Shahravesh  who was detained over a Facebook post made years before visiting Dubai. A Defining Reality We are seeing ordinary people caught in extraordinary circumstances. What begins as a simple act, sending a message, taking a photo, asking if it is safe, can escalate into detention under national security frameworks. There is an urgent need for clarity, proportionality, and humanitarian consideration. We have urged diplomats to release people who have innocently taken a photo where they have clearly meant no harm. Let them return to their homes and families and free them from this most stressful time. Selective Responsiveness to Allied Pressure The UAE’s deepening security partnership with the United States, including cooperation on regional stability, counterterrorism, maritime security in the Strait of Hormuz, and advanced technology and defense initiatives, has strengthened its strategic leverage. This close alignment appears to embolden Abu Dhabi in its domestic narrative control measures, including coordinated astroturfing campaigns, influencer regulation, and cybercrime enforcement. Security agreements with the Emirates are understood to be a key factor behind Western governments’ measured approach to public communications. Allies have often issued relatively restrained travel warnings or avoided stronger language regarding risks in Dubai, even amid visible economic impacts, flight disruptions, and security incidents. This restraint is widely perceived as an effort to support the UAE’s image as a stable hub and to avoid undermining a critical security partner. In practice, it can result in governments appearing to help manage or downplay coverage of issues that the UAE views as damaging to its reputation. In contrast, the UAE has shown less responsiveness to concerns from European Union allies and the UK on matters such as consular access and media reporting. This asymmetry highlights how security partnerships can influence the tone and intensity of allied criticism, allowing the UAE greater confidence in pursuing aggressive online reputation defence and legal measures without facing unified pushback. Final Line In the current environment, the greatest risk may not be what people say, but that they are now too afraid to say anything at all. The UAE’s image is becoming increasingly authoritarian. People want to be safe, but they do not want to live in fear of arrest either.  Many have already left while others are packing their bags, looking for an alternative life under another sun. We have been contacted by residents of Dubai seeking recommendations for alternative places to take up residence. In 2009, many fled to Spain, Cyprus, Thailand and Florida. We’re seeing a similar pattern now. Radha Stirling CEO at Detained in Dubai CEO at Due Process International +44 7 309 114 195

Extradition expert Radha Stirling, talks to the Sun. DUBAI has long sold itself as a playground for Brits – a sun-soaked safe haven of luxury hotels, tax-free living and iron-clad security. But a dramatic arrest and lighting-fast deportation carried out at the Kremlin‘s request has raised a chilling question – are Brits actually safe in the UAE? The Sun reports :  Dubai deported Lyubomir Korba to Russia after Moscow accused him of shooting a top general in Moscow, according to Kremlin state media. Radha Stirling , CEO and founder of   Detained in Dubai , warned she has seen “numerous cases” where targets – including Brits – have been extradited “to countries that the UK would certainly have opposed”. “This leaves British citizens and foreign nationals at significant risk when they travel to the UAE,” she told The Sun. “They may believe they are safe, but the UAE can easily deport them to a third country without due process and without consulting with the UK.” An uncomfortable possibility has been raised that the safety and legal rights of Western citizens in Dubai could be quietly traded for diplomatic leverage. Radha said: “Extradition is being used as leverage." “People are caught in the middle of state-to-state negotiations.” Radha added that the current framework incentivises aggressive requests, where leverage matters more than justice. “This is not law enforcement, ” she said. “It is deal-making. What matters is not evidence or human rights, but what the UAE gains.” Radha continued: “For some people, Dubai is no longer a transit hub. It has become a handover point.” " Innocent people are at risk of wrongful extradition to Russia and other countries like Uzbekistan, as I have seen recently in multiple cases.” Radha Stirling, Interpol and Extradition Expert, founder of IPEX Reform Radha said: “It is certainly concerning that the UAE cooperates with Russia and other countries in ways that bypass proper judicial process. “It puts innocent people at risk of wrongful extradition to Russia and other countries like Uzbekistan, as I have seen recently in multiple cases.” Campaign groups Detained in Dubai  and IPEX Reform  are calling for urgent international scrutiny of the UAE’s extradition practices. “If this continues, anyone with political or economic value can be traded,” Radha added. For the hundreds of thousands of Brits who live in, work in, or holiday in Dubai every year, this shift could carry serious consequences. Full Article Here: Radha Stirling CEO at Due Process International +44 7 309 114 195

A British citizen narrowly escaped extradition from the UAE to Uzbekistan under quid pro quo The UAE is using individuals as leverage in political and trade negotiations with European and other states, placing people at risk of arbitrary detention and extrajudicial removal. Radha Stirling , an international Interpol and extradition expert and the founder of Detained in Dubai  and  IPEX Reform , has warned that the United Arab Emirates is increasingly using wanted individuals as political leverage, with extradition decisions driven by diplomatic and commercial interests rather than evidence, merit, or due process. “The UAE was once criticised for being a safe haven,” said Radha Stirling. “What we are seeing now is far more dangerous. People are being traded when it suits state-to-state negotiations.” Stirling said the pattern is visible across multiple countries and high-profile cases. She pointed to the extradition of Christian Michel to India, which followed intense diplomatic pressure after the internationally condemned abduction of Princess Latifa. “The extradition took place at a moment of extreme reputational pressure on the UAE, ” Stirling said. In Europe, Stirling cited the extradition of Sanjay Shah to Denmark, which occurred only after Denmark lifted its arms-export ban to the UAE and signed bespoke extradition and mutual legal assistance treaties. By contrast, extradition requests from South Africa for members of the Gupta family were refused. “This makes it clear that extradition decisions are not based on the seriousness of allegations,”  Stirling said. “They are based on political alignment and leverage.” Stirling also highlighted Ireland, which signed an extradition treaty with the UAE in pursuit of organised crime figures. While limited cooperation followed, Ireland’s most significant target, Daniel Kinahan, remains in the UAE. “Lower-value figures may be moved,” Stirling said. “High-value individuals are retained for future negotiations.” She warned that the same approach is now emerging with Uzbekistan, a state with a documented record of corruption, torture, and politically motivated prosecutions. Stirling confirmed that Uzbek authorities have attempted to secure the extradition of British citizens from the UAE. “After the extrajudicial extradition of Ulugbek Shadmanov, Uzbekistan pushed the UAE to extradite a British national who had committed no wrongdoing,”  Stirling said.  “It is extraordinary that a state with Uzbekistan’s human-rights record can use Interpol mechanisms to target a British citizen in the UAE and then seek extradition as a form of pressure. Fortunately, we managed to save him but this is a risk many people living in or travelling to the UAE do not appreciate.” “ Extradition is being used as leverage,”  she added. “People are caught in the middle of state-to-state negotiations.” According to Stirling, the most alarming development is the UAE’s willingness to extradite British nationals to third countries with significantly worse human-rights records, without examining evidence, assessing political motivation, or protecting against torture or coercion. “Some extraditions are carried out suddenly, including overnight, with no meaningful access to lawyers and no transparent judicial process,” Stirling said. “That puts lives at risk.” She said INTERPOL mechanisms are routinely relied upon to justify such removals. “A Red Notice is treated as proof of guilt. It is not. It is often the starting point of abuse.” Stirling warned that the system now rewards authoritarian states that issue aggressive extradition requests. “ This is not law enforcement,”  she said. “It is deal-making. What matters is not evidence or human rights, but what the UAE gains.” Detained in Dubai and IPEX Reform are calling for urgent international scrutiny of UAE extradition practices, immediate diplomatic intervention to protect nationals at risk, and reform of Interpol and extradition systems to prevent their use as tools of political leverage. “If this continues,” Stirling said, “anyone with political or economic value can be traded.” Radha Stirling CEO at Detained in Dubai and IPEX Reform +44 7 309 114 195 IPEX Reform | Interpol Reform IPEX Interpol & Extradition Reform, Expert Witness, Interpol Removal, Crisis Management, Legislative & Government Advisory, by Radha Stirling.

Arrested in Dubai over spiteful ex's fake news police report. Dubai laws open to abuse. ​​ Detained in Dubai Warns of Rising Use of UAE Laws by Ex-Spouses to Target Partners Detained in Dubai ’s CEO, Radha Stirling  recounts the traumatic story of a woman who narrowly escaped several years in Dubai prison over a false slander allegation by her ex spouse. This is a warning to all individuals involved in contentious spousal disputes, particularly where there is a history of emotional or physical abuse. Stirling tells us, “It never entered her mind. Not in a million years did she imagine that her short trip to visit friends in Dubai would end in such trauma. “She had escaped an abusive relationship years ago and put it all behind her, or so she thought. She was financially stable, had the support of friends and family and was finally ready to take a much deserved holiday. She was excited to see her friends and see what glamorous Dubai had to offer. “But it wasn’t to be. An exciting vacation turned to horror when police turned up at her door and took her into custody. She had no idea what was going on. She hadn’t done anything wrong but suddenly she was being handcuffed and thrown in the back of a police car. The sinking feeling of being placed at the mercy of strangers in a foreign land and a foreign justice system. For a young woman to find herself in the hands of Arabic-speaking police, having done nothing wrong, is an absolute nightmare. “The fear she experienced was unimaginable. Desperate to know what was going on and conveying her innocence, she was eventually told there was a slander case against her from her ex under the UAE’s cybercrime laws. “They showed her the “evidence” but it wasn’t something she’d ever written. It was a crudely fabricated image, clearly manipulated, submitted solely to secure her arrest. She didn’t think even he would go that low or if he did, that it would even be possible to escalate it this far. She wondered why the police hadn’t done any investigation or analysis of the purported evidence. “The entire process was an education she never wanted but one that will scar her for ever. The police didn’t care that the evidence was fabricated, they weren’t there to prove her innocence after all. They were there to prosecute and why should they believe this woman over her prominent ex who likely had the police in his pockets. He was wealthy and most certainly had “wasta” in Dubai, a term she later learned refers to social influence and connections. She was left with the strong impression that his influence extended deep into local law enforcement. “When people have wasta in the UAE, they can get away with anything. They can jail anyone they want and their word is considered sufficient evidence, enough to secure a conviction. She also had to face the systemic sexism prevalent throughout the Middle East. Courts in the UAE have long favoured men in spousal disputes, family and custody cases. She had the odds stacked against her. “However, she was fortunate enough to be granted bail, but the prosecution was determined to press ahead. The case was driven forward regardless of the quality or credibility of the evidence. This would mean she’d be stuck in the UAE for months and even if found innocent in the end, the punishment would be the process. Her ex had weaponized the UAE’s justice system to the fullest extent. If she lost, it would be years in prisons notorious for beatings, human rights abuses and even deaths in custody. If she won, she still lost just to a lesser extent. “Given his wasta, we knew that if we were going to fight her case, it would need to be handled discreetly. One phone call from him could have meant her immediate detention (or worse) and there was concern her very life was in jeopardy. It was a tough case, but we were able to save her and she’s safe home, but if it were not for our early intervention, the likely outcome would have been years behind bars. “This case is not unusual. It’s actually common and it’s not what people expect. Both women and men have been stunned that their ex partner from their own country and culture would be so cunning and spiteful that they would use Dubai’s laws in that way. In many cases, the spouses have no connection to Dubai but it doesn’t matter since a police case can be opened at any time. One party can just take an Emirates holiday and open a frivolous case over some text message or social media post. The next time the victim arrives in Dubai, they’ll be arrested and prosecuted. It is a system that creates clear pathways for serious abuse. When law enforcement doesn't even care about facts and evidence, it’s even worse. “In a number of cases, spouses have made police complaints for the purpose of escalating the case to Interpol. It gives them the tool to have their partner arrested anywhere in the world, a deeply disturbing prospect for any victim of abuse. The UAE is the perfect system for abusers who want to cause personal pain to their exes and it’s been truly upsetting to observe the extremes some are prepared to reach, driven by spite or the desire to claim the final victory. “We encourage people with contentious family or spousal matters to exercise particular caution when planning travel (or if living in the country). If their former spouse is someone who frequents Dubai, they may want to reconsider the UAE as a destination themselves.” Stirling advises victims to get in touch without delay.  “For those encountering problems on the ground, we have a war chest of strategies and solutions ready to be deployed. Even where a situation seems hopeless, we will get you through. “ If you anticipate trouble or at risk of an abusive INTERPOL Red Notice, we have helped protect dozens of men and women from false allegations and international escalation. Proactive prevention is the most effective way to safeguard your position going forward, particularly where there is a hostile ex-spouse, business partner, or disgruntled colleague.” Radha Stirling CEO at Detained in Dubai +44 7 309 114 195

Human Rights Leader Radha Stirling reflects on 18 years on service Detained in Dubai celebrates EIGHTEEN years of incredible work! Wow! Detained in Dubai is now 18 years old and has helped more than twenty five thousand people over its nearly two decades of operation. “It’s hard to believe it was 18 years ago that my friend and colleague was arrested in Dubai. It almost feels like yesterday”,  reflects   Detained in Dubai  founder Radha Stirling . “I am endlessly grateful that I was able to help him and grateful that it led to me being able to help thousands more facing injustice and even facing life threatening situations. We’ve had cases ranging from business and financial conflict to cryptocurrency persecution to serious violent crime to human rights violations, torture and daring escapes. We’ve seen our work pay off with increased travel warnings, important changes to laws and governmental investigations into wrongdoing. “I’m forever thankful to the international community, the United Nations, governments and individual politicians who have supported our work, our diplomacy and our clients. I’m always appreciative of the brave journalists and media who have often put their own safety on the line to help spotlight some of the most egregious issues and generating the pressure necessary for change. “This past year has seen us grow as an organisation, expand the tactical approach used to solve cases under the radar, helping people get their lives back, even where they thought they were doomed. We’ve seen so many emotional reunions, including most recently, tortured grandfather Albert Douglas who made it home in time for Christmas. We’ve ensured the safe return of high profile clients, veterans and celebrities facing unjust allegations. We’ve advocated for women who have suffered violence and trafficking, child abduction and domestic abuse as well as victims of Dubai's arbitrary and evidence-light drug enforcement practices. US veteran and mother FREED from UAE after Trump and Rubio intervene Due Process Newsroom & Media Centre “We’ve taken on some serious conflicts with overlapping Interpol and Extradition issues helping ‘Bitcoin Jesus’ Roger Ver and facing up to a corrupt and oppressive  regime in Uzbekistan . Some of our advocacy has attracted powerful enemies and every day this past year at Detained in Dubai has been both challenging and rewarding. We are closely watching the evolving relationships with Western governments and the Middle East and are thankful for the diplomatic assistance provided by the Irish and American governments, including Sec. Rubio, Vice President Vance and President Trump. Is Uzbekistan at the start of the Magnitsky Act process? An interview with human rights advocate Radha Stirling Live Discussion with Tara Reade on her $100M Lawsuit Against Biden’s FBI,  Wray & Garland   Tara Reade's lawsuit against key figures in the Biden administration  adds another layer to an already contentious political climate. Radha Stirling represented Biden victim, Tara Reade who faced persecution from Joe Biden. “Interpol has remained one of our core areas of focus. We have helped dozens of clients proactively prevent Interpol Red Notices from ever being issued, protecting them from unexpected arrests while travelling and the devastating consequences that can follow. Dubai arrests of Scots gangsters blasted as 'PR exercise' by human rights lawyer - Daily Record   Steven Lyons, Ross "Miami" McGill, Stephen Jamieson, Steven Larwood and a fifth man said to be from Edinburgh were taken into custody by police in the oil-rich city state last week. “The battle continues and it’s an honour to lead it. Thank you to our team at Detained in Dubai, our friends, allies and supporters. You give us the courage and certainty that we will continue to win. “That same commitment, experience, and determination now guide the work we continue to do every day for those who still need urgent help.” Legal Services in Dubai Contact Detained in Dubai first. We work with a team of vetted, trusted and discrete lawyers on the ground. You won’t get a more effective results driven team. If all legal avenues have been exhausted or you have lost hope, we will still find a solution and you will be home soon. Expert Representation Stirling’s work and experience led her to being recognised as an Expert Witness in extradition, Interpol, civil, criminal and immigration cases. The UAE’s abuse of the Interpol Red Notice database inspired her to tackle the world’s largest information sharing agency and call for its transparency and accountability. Just does it! After 18 years in the game, Stirling takes a no-nonsense approach. It’s about getting things done and fast. She understands the stakes and the urgency. Stirling has faced formidable opponents including multiple royal families and world leaders, oppressive governments, oligarchs, criminal gangs, security forces and international agencies. Her work has seen targets freed from jail, safely relocated and saved from judicial weaponization. Stirling acts for celebrities, royals and big business owners but consistently helps in cases of injustice against tourists and expats, many of which have been covered by the international media. Marcus Fakana was released from prison after an intensive campaign, as was Mia O’Brien and Albert Douglas. Marcus Fakana: Teen jailed in Dubai for sex with girl is released The Londoner was jailed in December for a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old British girl. British law student, 24, found with £2,500 of cocaine at Dubai party is freed in time for Christmas family reunion after being jailed for 25 years | Daily Mail Online Canadian man’s Dubai life sentence is overturned and he arrives safely home Abert Douglas tells all from the safety of his home in London 2026 Detained in Dubai will continue to fight injustice, to challenge oppressive governments, to fight against censorship, weaponization, authoritarianism and to take on organisations like Interpol while fighting for clients, one at a time. Get in Touch Whether you need an experienced and reliable legal team, litigation support, expert testimony, Interpol Red Notice deletion, crisis management or media support, we are here and we’re ready to fight for you. The sooner you get in touch, the stronger the chances of success. What We Do Criminal Defence and Civil Litigation in the UAE and abroad Crisis Management Media, PR & Reputation Management Litigation Support Multi Jurisdictional Legal Representation Interpol Red Notice Prevention and Deletion Extradition Defence Expert Witness Testimony Expert Testimony for Immigration Applications Debt Negotiations & Dispute Resolution United Nations Applications & Representation UAE Police Checks Interpol Checks Government Lobbying Emergency Assistance & Evacuations And Much More… Check out the Services pages  of the Detained in Dubai Website   Radha Stirling  - CEO at Detained in Dubai  - +44 7 309 114 195 Contact details can be found here

Radha Stirling expresses her condolences to Marcus Fakana's family and her gratitude that so many have returned safely for Christmas this year. Detained in Dubai has helped hundreds of human rights victims this 2025 and will continue saving lives into the New Year. As we welcome the New Year, we reflect on a year that ended with something truly precious for so many people: being home for Christmas. This includes the many clients whose cases have been public like Albert Douglas , Mia O'Brien  and just as importantly, those whose names will never appear in headlines. Families reunited, parents back with their children, partners no longer separated by borders, detention, or fear. These moments, often quiet and unseen, are the real measure of success. We also recognise those who are now safe, protected, and no longer facing immediate threat. Some are rebuilding their lives privately after long ordeals. Others, such as Roger Ver, are secure and able to focus on their future rather than survival. Whether through release, safe relocation, the lifting of travel bans, or the prevention of abusive international actions, each outcome represents a life stabilised and a crisis averted. As the New Year begins, we carry forward deep gratitude and renewed determination. Every person who is free, safe, or reunited today reinforces why this work matters. We remain committed to standing with those still fighting, protecting those at risk, and ensuring that no one is left alone when justice fails them. May the year ahead bring continued safety, healing, accountability, and peace to all those we have supported and those yet to come. As CEO of Detained in Dubai , Radha Stirling  issued a statement: “As CEO of Detained in Dubai, I want to thank everyone who trusted us during what was often the most frightening period of their lives. I also want to acknowledge the families who endured months or years of uncertainty, the quiet supporters who helped behind the scenes, and the professionals who acted with integrity when it mattered most. This work is never easy, and it is never abstract. It involves real people, real fear, and real consequences. " "This year also carried deep sadness with the loss of Marcus Fakana , whose story will never be forgotten and whose family remains in our thoughts." "To see so many others home for Christmas, including those whose cases were public such as Albert Douglas and Mia O’Brien, and many more who remain private, is deeply humbling. On behalf of Detained in Dubai, I wish you peace and stability in the year ahead. Happy New Year 2026.” Radha Stirling CEO at Detained in Dubai +44 7 309 114 195

UAE Employment disputes huge risk to expat workers who have been left homeless, criminalised or listed on Interpol just so an employer can save on EOS payments. One of the most common triggers of wrongful criminal allegations in the UAE is not fraud, theft, or embezzlement, it is simply an employment dispute. Foreign professionals who work hard for years in Dubai often find that when it comes time to collect their end-of-service benefit, suddenly accusations appear, designed to deny them what they are legally owed. This was the case for one British national who spent years overseeing major projects in Dubai. His role was purely technical: ensuring that projects were delivered on time and to the required standard. He was not responsible for contracts, payments, or finances. But when he resigned and became entitled to a substantial end-of-service payment, he was blindsided with allegations of “abuse of power” and threats of criminal cases. The accusations centred on subcontractor invoices, yet he had never controlled budgets, signed contracts, or handled company money. All payments went directly from the finance department to subcontractors. His only responsibility was to confirm whether the work had been completed. Still, he was suddenly questioned about missing paperwork, duplicate invoices, and supposed financial impropriety. The reality was simpler: his employer did not want to pay him his end-of-service entitlement. Instead of resolving the matter through the proper civil or employment channels, they attempted to reframe it as a criminal case. Local lawyers even advised him to leave the country for his own safety while they “handled” the issue, but no evidence of wrongdoing was ever produced. Years later, there remains a risk that the UAE could escalate this baseless employment dispute into an INTERPOL Red Notice request. Such a move would be profoundly abusive: INTERPOL’s own rules forbid its systems from being used to enforce civil or contractual claims. Yet countless professionals remain trapped, unable to travel internationally for fear of wrongful arrest. “We continue to see cases where employment disputes are criminalised in order to pressure or punish expatriates,”  said Interpol expert Radha Stirling , founder of Detained in Dubai  and Due Process International.   “End-of-service benefits are a frequent flashpoint. Instead of paying what is owed, companies resort to false allegations. It’s an abuse of the UAE’s criminal justice system, and when escalated to INTERPOL, it becomes an abuse of international law.” For this British national, the impact has been devastating. He has avoided all international travel since leaving the UAE, unable to visit family abroad or even take a holiday with his wife and children. His professional reputation remains overshadowed by the risk of a Red Notice, despite the absence of any evidence of criminality. This case is just one example of how the misuse of criminal complaints in Dubai, particularly around end-of-service leave, can have lasting consequences far beyond the UAE’s borders. It underscores why prevention applications with INTERPOL are so vital for professionals who have faced such disputes. “We are seeing more and more professionals taking preventative action before a Red Notice is issued,” said Radha Stirling .  “By filing confidential applications in advance, we can ensure that INTERPOL is alerted to the abusive nature of the case and block it from ever appearing on the system. Prevention affords clients peace of mind and protects their freedom of movement.” If you believe you could be at risk of an INTERPOL Notice arising from an employment or financial dispute in the UAE, it is vital to act early. Confidential prevention requests are often the difference between safe international travel and being wrongfully detained abroad. Radha Stirling CEO and founder of Detained in Dubai , IPEX Reform , Interpol Red Notice   and Due Process International    +44 7 309 114 195

Contact   Detained in Dubai  for expert advice, Interpol Red Notice prevention , debt negotiation  or emergency assistance if still in the UAE In the late 2000s, Dubai was booming with property investment. Thousands of foreign buyers were encouraged to invest in off plan developments with promises of rapid returns. Mortgages were readily offered, often secured not by assets, but by blank post dated cheques handed over as part of the financing process. When the 2008 global financial crisis hit, the market collapsed. Developers such as Nakheel revised terms or left buyers unable to recover deposits. Many investors were left with no property, no recourse, and huge debts they could not possibly service. Mortgage financiers, including government linked banks, resorted to presenting the security cheques when payments stopped. Under UAE law, a bounced cheque was and still technically is a criminal offence, even when arising from a civil or contractual dispute. One investor, unable to keep up with payments during the financial crisis, saw his 400,000 AED deposit disappear when the bank moved to cash his security cheques. What began as a default quickly escalated into litigation and the threat of criminal prosecution. More than a decade later, he was still facing a criminal complaint for AED 1.75 million. Although recent reforms were promoted as removing criminal liability for bounced cheques, in practice these changes do not apply retrospectively. Old cases remain active, allowing prosecutors and creditors to pursue debtors through the criminal system, with the added danger of INTERPOL notices long after the original dispute. “We have submitted his case to the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files to ensure that any abusive attempt to circulate a Red Notice is blocked,” said Interpol and extradition expert, Radha Stirling . This is not an isolated situation. Countless foreign nationals who defaulted on mortgages during the crash still face active or threatened legal actions in the UAE. Some have been surprised to find INTERPOL Red Notices issued years later, impacting their ability to travel, work internationally, or even open a bank account. Why Prevention Matters Interpol expert Radha Stirling, the founder of IPEX Reform  and Detained in Dubai , has long warned of the dangers of INTERPOL abuse. Creditors in the UAE frequently weaponise the system to exert pressure, knowing that even the threat of a Red Notice can ruin someone’s livelihood. To counter this, her team works with at-risk individuals to file preventive requests with the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files. This proactive step means that if the UAE or another jurisdiction attempts to issue a Red Notice, INTERPOL has already been alerted to the abusive nature of the case and is far more likely to block or delete it swiftly. Advice for Those at Risk Do not assume the passage of time will protect you. Even debts and bounced cheque cases from the financial crisis era remain active. Law reforms in the UAE do not always mean practical relief. Despite announcements, old debts are still pursued, and creditors are still using criminal channels. Be proactive, not reactive. Waiting until you are detained at a border crossing or denied a visa is too late. Seek expert advice. INTERPOL is a powerful tool, but it is also vulnerable to misuse. Having professional guidance can prevent devastating consequences. Taking Control of Your Future The reality is stark. People who defaulted on mortgages during the global crash are still facing legal and reputational risks today. The best protection is prevention. Preventive action gives at risk individuals the ability to travel, work, and live without fear of unexpected arrests or humiliating detentions. If you are unsure whether you may be at risk, or you know of debts, bounced cheques, or unresolved disputes in the UAE, now is the time to act. Being proactive could mean the difference between freedom and years of legal battles. Confidential advice?   info@detainedindubai.org Contact Detained in Dubai for expert advice, Interpol Red Notice prevention, debt negotiation or emergency assistance if still in the UAE Radha Stirling CEO and founder of Detained in Dubai , IPEX Reform , Interpol Red Notice   and Due Process International    +44 7 309 114 195

Detention of Former INTERPOL Files Chief in Dubai Sparks Global Alarm Over Corruption and Immunity FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Detention of Former INTERPOL Files Chief in Dubai Sparks Global Alarm Over Corruption and Immunity Radha Stirling : “Pîrlog’s arrest exposes a system rotting from the top. INTERPOL must no longer be above the law.” 20 June 2025 — Dubai and Lyon The reported detention of Vitalie Pîrlog , former Chairman of INTERPOL’s Commission for the Control of Files (CCF), in Dubai , has triggered renewed international alarm over structural corruption, political manipulation, and a dangerous lack of accountability within INTERPOL. Radha Stirling , Interpol expert and founder of   IPEX (Interpol and Extradition Reform  and Due Process International , says the arrest highlights a disturbing trend in which INTERPOL’s highest officials, those responsible for upholding justice, are themselves accused of abusing power for personal or political gain. “Vitalie Pîrlog was in charge of the very committee meant to prevent political persecution and wrongful Red Notices, ” Stirling said. “Now, he is suspected of selling access to that system. This is a betrayal not just of INTERPOL’s mission, but of every individual who has been victimised by the misuse of its tools.” Pîrlog’s alleged involvement in corrupt Red Notice deletions comes after several other high-level scandals. In 2018, INTERPOL President Meng Hongwei  was detained and later imprisoned in China. In 2021, INTERPOL appointed Ahmed Naser Al-Raisi , a senior Emirati official accused of torture, as President, despite multiple criminal complaints filed against him across Europe. “Three top officials in just a few years, each linked to credible allegations of abuse, corruption, or human rights violations,”  Stirling said. “INTERPOL has become a revolving door for authoritarians who view the organisation as a tool to consolidate power and settle scores.” Most concerning, Stirling notes, is that INTERPOL operates under sweeping immunity agreements, which shield the organisation and its staff from prosecution or civil litigation. “This is an institution with global policing powers and zero legal accountability,”  she said. “Its decisions can destroy lives, yet no one can be held to account when those powers are abused.” Through her work at Due Process International and IPEX, Stirling has represented hundreds of clients who were wrongly targeted by INTERPOL Red Notices and Diffusions, often issued at the request of authoritarian regimes seeking to silence dissidents, harass businesspeople, or punish asylum seekers. “INTERPOL has become a tool for transnational repression, extortion, and persecution,” she said.  “It is used by its member states not to combat crime, but to bully, harass and intimidate. And the global public has no remedy when that system fails.” IPEX and Due Process International are calling for the immediate lifting of INTERPOL’s global immunity,   to allow for legal accountability and independent investigation of abuse. The organisations are also urging the creation of an external oversight body to review leadership appointments and safeguard against politically motivated misuse. “This is not just a problem with one official or one regime,” Stirling said. “It is a structural crisis. INTERPOL must be brought back under the rule of law. That starts with lifting its immunity and ending the culture of impunity.” Radha Stirling CEO at Due Process International +44 7 309 114 195

CBD Vape Arrest in Qatar: British Man Protected from Qatar INTERPOL Red Notice Notice British Man Spared INTERPOL Red Notice After Qatar Vape Arrest A British national never expected a simple online order to lead to arrest, imprisonment, and a looming international legal threat. While staying in Qatar, he purchased two clothing items and a CBD e-cigarette online. But when one clothing item was unavailable, the seller substituted five CBD vapes, without warning him that these products were illegal in Qatar, despite their widespread and visible use. He was jailed for 23 days before being released and allowed to return home to England. He believed the matter was over. It wasn’t. Months later, he learned that Qatari authorities had prosecuted him in absentia, sentencing him to three months in prison and a fine of around US$2,500. Shocked and alarmed, he feared the next step would be an INTERPOL Red Notice, a tool Qatar has notoriously misused in the past. One of the most well-known examples is the case of Scottish national Conor Howard , who was allowed to leave Qatar, only to be reported to INTERPOL later. He was arrested while on holiday in Greece and detained for four months awaiting extradition proceedings. Although he ultimately won his case, the ordeal inflicted serious harm on him and his family. “Conor’s case really stuck with my client,”  said Radha Stirling, CEO of Detained in Doha and Due Process International. “He was blindsided by a Red Notice after being allowed to leave Qatar, exactly the kind of scenario we were determined to prevent.” He engaged Radha Stirling, an two decades long expert in the field and founder of IPEX (Interpol and Extradition) Reform  who also represented Conor Howard. Stirling launched a preventative submission to INTERPOL. The goal was to block any potential Red Notice before it could be issued, highlighting Qatar’s history of abuse, the disproportionality of the charges, and the human rights concerns involved. The outcome was a clear success. The client was neither listed nor detained, and his ability to travel remains fully protected. “Travelling is massively important to me, and the ability to do so safely is a huge relief,” he said. “I’m incredibly grateful to Radha for protecting my freedom. Her support has been invaluable.” Radha Stirling commented, “Qatar’s misuse of INTERPOL as a tool of retaliation is well-documented. Like in Conor Howard’s case, the aim is not extradition, but to cause disruption and distress. Our job is to stop that abuse before it starts and in this case, we did.” If you’re concerned about a potential Red Notice from Qatar or another Gulf country, contact us now for a confidential assessment. Acting early can mean the difference between freedom and detention. Radha Stirling , CEO at Due Process International +44 7 309 114 195

UAE Extradites Sean McGovern in Image Makeover Attempt But Rule of Law Remains in Question Dublin, Ireland:   30 May 2025 Extradition expert Radha Stirling warns the Emirates remains a dangerous jurisdiction despite headline-grabbing extradition The United Arab Emirates has extradited Sean McGovern, an alleged associate of the Kinahan cartel, to Ireland in a move widely portrayed as a sign that the country is no longer a haven for transnational crime. But according to Radha Stirling , an Interpol and Extradition expert and founder of Detained in Dubai , the action is less about judicial reform and more about managing international optics. “This extradition is being used as a public relations exercise,”  Stirling said. “The UAE wants to shed its reputation as a criminal safe haven, especially under pressure from Interpol, the FATF, and Western allies. But one extradition doesn’t reflect meaningful change in a legal system that remains opaque, politicised, and lacking in basic due process.” Stirling, who has represented dozens of clients facing wrongful detention, politicised prosecutions, and retaliatory extradition attempts in the UAE, warns that the Emirates remains an unpredictable and unsafe jurisdiction for anyone who finds themselves accused, whether fairly or not. “Extraditions from the UAE are rarely the result of impartial legal proceedings. More often, they are part of political or diplomatic bargaining. Quid pro quo arrangements that have little to do with justice. This makes it incredibly dangerous for anyone with business disputes, political enemies, or public profiles that might make them a target.” While the UAE’s cooperation in extraditing McGovern is likely to be promoted as a gesture of good faith, Stirling says it must be viewed in the broader context of selective enforcement and strategic image management. “The UAE continues to host high-profile individuals facing serious international scrutiny. Yet enforcement appears to depend not on the strength of evidence, but on whether the person in question is politically and economically expendable. There is no consistency or transparency and that should deeply concern Ireland and all countries engaging in extradition treaties with the UAE.” Stirling is also founder of IPEX Reform  and Due Process International , organisations which have repeatedly raised concerns over abuse of INTERPOL systems and misuse of bilateral extradition agreements. “McGovern’s extradition will be used to polish the UAE’s image. But the same risks remain, including arbitrary arrests, lack of fair trials, and politically motivated prosecutions. It is vital that Western governments approach such cooperation with caution and scrutiny.” Despite repeated marketing efforts by the UAE to present itself as a modern and law-abiding partner in global security, Stirling warns that the fundamental legal landscape remains unchanged, putting foreign nationals at risk. ENDS For further comment or interviews with Radha Stirling: 📧 press@detainedindubai.org 📞 +44 (0)20 7222 5272 🌐   www.detainedindubai.org