Search Results

Detained in Dubai has secured the removal of another client’s name from the Interpol database after being subjected to an abusive Red Notice at the request of Qatar. Interpol's system of Red Notices allows member countries to request the arrest and extradition of individuals who are wanted for prosecution or to serve a sentence. However, the system has been frequently misused and abused by some member countries, particularly Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and other Gulf States, to pursue individuals in foreign jurisdictions over financial disputes or debts, using Interpol as a tactic of intimidation, harassment, and extortion. Detained in Dubai explained that the client, a British national who had been working in Qatar, had been charged and convicted in absentia for a bounced cheque. However, the cheque was written as security against a bank loan, which she had been paying off regularly for up to four years. The bulk of the loan had already been repaid when the client was abruptly laid off from her job, but she was informed by Qatar National Bank (QNB) that her final salary and parting bonus would cover the remaining balance. Despite these assurances, the security cheque for the total amount of the loan was wrongfully submitted for payment and inevitably bounced. “The terms of the loan agreement clearly stipulated that our client’s employer was liable for the outstanding balance,” explained Radha Stirling, CEO and Founder of Detained in Dubai, “But QNB attempted to cash the security cheque for the full amount of the loan, without registering a full four years of payments; and they did not sort the issue out with our client’s employer. Instead, they opened a police case against her after she had already departed Qatar, and secured a conviction in absentia, followed swiftly by the issuance of a Red Notice on Interpol. This exact scenario has become so frequent from the Gulf States that many jurisdictions around the world no longer regard Red Notices issued on behalf of those countries as credible. Nevertheless, being listed on Interpol is tremendously disruptive and our client was indeed detained in Mykonos, Greece, when authorities discovered the Red Notice against her. She was forced to undergo a judicial review for possible extradition, but the Greek court ultimately dismissed the request for lack of merit. Even after the Greek authorities fulfilled the purpose of the Red Notice, our client’s name was not deleted from the Interpol system.” Stirling said that this case highlights, yet again, the urgent need for serious reform in the way Interpol manages data collection and Red Notice requests, “Interpol applies no scrutiny to requests for Notices, even from habitual abusers of the system, and they have no process for automatic deletion once Notices become redundant. It can take months for Interpol to review removal requests, during which time the wrongfully listed can expect to be treated like fugitives or terrorists any time they travel. It exposes them to enormous emotional as well as financial trauma, and by all rights they should be compensated,” Stirling continued, “We have successfully removed so many clients from Interpol’s database over inappropriate Red Notices that a clear pattern of Interpol abuse by countries like Qatar had become absolutely undeniable. In each of these cases, innocent people have been put through needless suffering, reputational damage, and legal expense, and the blame belongs both to the countries requesting invalid Red Notices, and to Interpol itself for accepting such requests. We are currently exploring a class action suit on behalf of this ever-growing pool of clients to finally achieve some restitution for the ordeals they have been through.” Over the past 15 years, Detained in Dubai has emerged as the most effective organisation for combatting wrongful Red Notices, boasting a 100% success rate in securing the deletion of inappropriate listings. CEO Radha Stirling has led the call for Interpol reform and founded a sister organisation dedicated to increasing Interpol’s transparency, accountability, ethical standards, and compliance with due process. “We have developed a relationship with Interpol over the years,” She explained, “We are able to offer clients a reliable approach to avoiding a wrongful listing, as well as being able to ensure that any such listing will be appropriately dealt with if or when they do occur. Every time we successfully secure the deletion of an invalid Red Notice, while we are of course happy for our clients, it provides further evidence that Interpol needs to do better, and we remain committed to achieving the necessary reforms that will enable Interpol to fulfil its important function to international policing without victimising the innocent.” Travelling when you have a UAE or Qatar debt Nerve wracking: Will I be arrested at the airport? IPEX. Interpol & Extradition Reform INTERPOL PRESS PACK interpolrednotice.com Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

The goal of a brochure or tourism advertisement, obviously, is to make enticing promises that fuel the hopes of travellers about having the most idyllic holiday possible. Tourists planning a vacation, however, need to look deeper than these glossy presentations to distinguish fact from fiction, and governments need to provide accurate risk assessments to help their citizens choose safe destinations. The growing importance of places like Dubai, however, has made it considerably more difficult for tourists to make informed decisions about travel specifically to the Gulf. Both because nations like the UAE and Qatar strictly control news and information about conditions in their countries, effectively turning most media coverage into positive marketing; and because they enjoy significant economic and political influence in the West; potential travellers are inevitably misinformed about the real dangers hidden beneath the glitz and glamour of the region’s luxurious packaging. Travelling to the Arab Gulf States, particularly the UAE and Qatar, can be highly risky for tourists. Western governments need to issue greater travel warnings to highlight the dangers associated with visiting these countries. The primary concern for travellers is the strict laws and regulations governing drug and alcohol consumption, and the severe penalties for those who break them – not to mention the ease with which false allegations of law-breaking can lead to convictions. The UAE, in particular, has some of the harshest drug laws in the world. It prohibits a range of different substances, from CBD oil to pharmaceuticals, and even over-the-counter medications, such as cold and flu remedies, are subject to strict scrutiny. While many countries have strict drug laws, the primary difference with the UAE is the corruption of police, law enforcement procedures, and the judicial system. A mere allegation is sufficient evidence to arrest and prosecute individuals, and even if someone is innocent, it can take more than a year of detention and hefty legal bills to be exonerated. Visitors have been arrested for possession of drugs “in their bloodstream” even where the drug has been legally consumed abroad. Visitors have also been arrested in the UAE for cannabis residue that can remain in the blood for up to two months. Dubai's police procedures leave foreigners open to legal abuse. Dozens of other British nationals have been caught out by reckless police procedures that cast such a wide net that people can be arrested because an acquaintance was arrested, or because they attended a party where someone allegedly had drugs. Andy Neal, a British national, was arrested because he simply had someone's number in his phone. He spent a year in prison before being exonerated. Simply abstaining from drugs does not protect visitors from wrongful arrest and prosecution. Local authorities are rewarded for drug-related arrests and convictions, and are thus incentivised to exaggerate or even fabricate cases; and those who fall foul will end up in prisons notorious for human rights abuses and torture. This can be a terrifying prospect for tourists who are arrested for what are considered minor offences in their home countries, such as drug possession, or even for things as trivial as swearing or making rude gestures in public. Radha Stirling interviews American detained in Dubai over legal marijuana. “He’s free”. “Nevada resident Peter Clark, from California, was finally freed from Dubai after his 2 month ordeal which cost him $50,000. Peter was deported late Tuesday night on a flight via Doha to New York.”. Detained in Dubai CEO, Radha Stirling, announced Peter Clark’s safe return to the United States. “Nevada resident Peter Clark, from California, was finally freed from Dubai after his 2 month ordeal which cost him $50,000. Visitors have been arrested for tiny amounts of drug residue found in their possessions, bags, and even in their bodies. Some drugs remain detectable for months, and travellers need to be mindful of this when visiting or transiting through the Middle East. It is important to avoid engaging with anyone else who may be taking drugs in the UAE and avoid clubs and parties that may attract drug users. Visitors should also be mindful of consuming alcohol, as a simple complaint that you are "drunk" can land you in jail, even if you've only had one drink. The UAE's legal system is not only strict when it comes to drugs and alcohol but also with other offences. Public displays of affection, wearing immodest clothing, and insulting Islam or its prophets are considered criminal offences. Additionally, the judicial system is heavily biassed against foreigners, and it can be difficult for non-Arabic speakers to understand legal proceedings, making it challenging to defend oneself in court. Tourists should also be aware that the UAE's laws on internet use and social media are equally strict. Posting or sharing anything that could be considered offensive, including criticism of the government or its policies, can result in arrest and imprisonment. In some cases, even liking or sharing a post deemed offensive can result in prosecution. Visitors can even be arrested over private WhatsApp chats, if officials find the content objectionable. Foreign Office told “Dubai travel warnings insufficient” Coroner tells FCDO to increase Dubai travel warnings. The inquest into the death of Lee Bradley Brown heard that the number of new cases of Britons reporting torture or mistreatment in Dubai to the Foreign Office had surged from 3 per cent of the global total to 13 per cent in just four years, but “that is only the tip of the iceberg”, explained Radha Stirling, CEO of Detained in Dubai who has advocated for victims since 2008. ​ The Coroner produced a prevention of future deaths report. In conclusion, tourists need to exercise caution when travelling to the Arab Gulf States, particularly the UAE and Qatar. The strict laws and regulations governing drug and alcohol consumption, as well as other offences, mean that visitors must be mindful of their behaviour at all times. Western governments should issue greater travel warnings to highlight the risks associated with visiting these countries. Visitors should research local laws and customs before travelling, and if in doubt, they should be able to seek advice from their embassy or consulate – if only they can be reliably and accurately informed about the risks. By being aware of the dangers, tourists can take steps to protect themselves and ensure safety – but unfortunately, even awareness is not always enough. If a tourist encounters a problem with law enforcement, we strongly advise foreign nationals to contact Detained in Dubai immediately, before hiring a local attorney. Lawyers from the region very often have histories and even family connections with judges and prosecutors, and demand exorbitant fees only to expedite convictions for the sake of improving their own relationships with officials. We will assist clients in dealing with their embassies, diplomats, and government representatives back home, as well as with local authorities; and we can ensure that their cases receive the appropriate attention to resolve them successfully. Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

When South Africa ratified an extradition treaty with the UAE in 2018, officials assumed this would fast track requests like the Gupta brothers who are accused of a number of corruption and fraud related crimes. The treaty put South African citizens at risk of extradition to a country that the United Kingdom refuses requests from due to the “real risk of human rights violations and torture” but it seems they are struggling to achieve the mutual cooperation they’d hoped for. UAE dismisses S.African request to extradite Gupta brothers | Reuters A United Arab Emirates court has dismissed South Africa's request to extradite Atul and Rajesh Gupta, brothers who face charges of political corruption, but the Gulf state said on Friday the extradition request could be resubmitted. “The decision to extradite wanted persons from the UAE has largely played out as political rulings in recent years”, says IPEX Reform founder Radha Stirling, an expert witness in Interpol and Extradition matters. The UAE will extradite persons where there is a clear quid pro quo arrangement with the requesting country. We only have to look at the prompt extradition of several high profile parties to India following India’s illegal attack on US flagged yacht Nostromo to recover the escaping Princess Latifa, daughter of the ruler of Dubai. ‘Quid Pro Quo UAE’ using diplomacy to expand powers “It was nothing short of shocking to see the UAE hand over British national Christian Michel immediately upon India’s unlawful attack of a US yacht”, said Radha Stirling, CEO of Detained in Dubai and Due Process International, who represents Sheikha Latifa Al Maktoum... Due Process Newsroom & Media Centre British citizen Sanjay Shah’s extradition to Denmark was recently approved as part of an effort to show cooperation with Western nations following the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF’s) inclusion of the UAE on a “grey list” of financial crime monitoring. ‘Denmark Faces Human Rights Issues over UAE Extradition Treaty’ says Expert ‘Denmark Faces Human Rights Issues over UAE Extradition Treaty’ says Expert Dubai court upholds Danish extradition of British businessman in cum-ex case - Global Investigations Review Dubai’s highest court has rejected Sanjay Shah’s appeal against his extradition to Denmark, where he is accused of stealing over $1 billion through a complex tax fraud scheme. Last year, an Australian citizen was wrongfully reported to Interpol by South Korea and although Interpol cancelled the Red Notice, the UAE agreed to extradite him anyway in the dark of night. On the other hand, high profile and wealthy wanted persons have been protected by the UAE to the point where the country is known to be a safe haven for white collar criminals and while it appears the country is seeking to improve its image in this respect, it should come as no surprise that the Gupta brothers will not be extradited at this time. The UAE denied the extradition, ruling that it had jurisdiction over the charges of money laundering while the other charges related to corruption and fraud were removed from the extradition request. South Africa is expected to lodge an appeal and the success of that appeal will likely come down to diplomacy rather than any legal due process. The UAE’s arbitrary enforcement of extradition laws means the country is not a safe haven for the guilty or the innocent. Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

Interpol plays a critical role in coordinating international efforts to combat crime, terrorism, and other transnational threats. However, in recent years, concerns have been raised about the potential for private funding of Interpol to unduly bias the organisation's neutrality. Private funding refers to financial contributions made by corporations, foundations, or individuals to support the work of Interpol. While private funding can be a valuable source of support for organisations, it also raises questions about the potential for conflicts of interest and undue influence. Interpol's mission is to promote international police cooperation and to assist in the enforcement of national and international laws. To fulfil this mission effectively, Interpol must be, and be seen as, an impartial and neutral organisation that operates solely in the interests of justice and the rule of law. UAE General accused of torture now head of Interpol While the position is largely ceremonial, Al-Raisi’s election has raised serious concerns among legal experts and activists globally. However, if private entities are allowed to fund Interpol's activities, there is a risk that the organisation's decisions and actions could be influenced by the interests of these funders. For example, a corporation that contributes significant funding to Interpol may expect the organisation to prioritise investigations that align with the corporation's interests or to avoid investigating matters that could harm the corporation's reputation. Another concern with private funding of Interpol is that it could compromise the organisation's transparency and accountability. Private funders may expect a level of influence or control over the organisation's activities in exchange for their financial support. This could result in a lack of transparency regarding Interpol's decision-making processes, as well as a lack of accountability for the organisation's actions. Furthermore, private funding could lead to a situation where Interpol is seen as a tool of powerful interests rather than an impartial law enforcement organisation. This could undermine the trust and cooperation that Interpol relies on to carry out its mission effectively. While Interpol has taken steps to strengthen its policies and procedures around private funding. For example, the establishment of a Code of Ethics that sets out the principles that should guide its relationship with private funders. The code emphasises the importance of transparency, accountability, and impartiality in Interpol's dealings with private entities. Interpol has also established a dedicated unit to oversee its private sector engagement. This unit is responsible for ensuring that private funding is used in accordance with Interpol's Code of Ethics and, theoretically ensuring that the organisation's independence and neutrality are not compromised by its relationships with private entities. Saudi Prince uses Interpol to prevent damaging witness testimony While these measures are a step in the right direction, they do not go far enough to address the potential risks associated with private funding of Interpol. Objectively, the organisation's Code of Ethics is not sufficiently detailed or comprehensive to provide clear guidance on how to manage the risks of private funding effectively. There is, for instance, no independent oversight of private funding or its use, and indeed, no external accountability mechanisms to investigate potentially biassed practices by Interpol that may occur as a result of that funding. To address these concerns, IPEX believes several measures could be implemented to improve the financial and operational transparency of Interpol. These broadly include: 1. Increased Transparency around Private Funding One of the primary concerns regarding Interpol's operations is the potential for private funding to unduly influence the organisation's decisions and actions. To address this concern, Interpol should increase its transparency around private funding by: a. Requiring all private donations to be disclosed publicly: Interpol should require that all private donations, regardless of their size, are disclosed publicly on the organisation's website. This will enable greater scrutiny of Interpol's funding sources and help to identify potential conflicts of interest. b. Implementing clear guidelines for the acceptance of private funding: Interpol should establish clear guidelines for the acceptance of private funding to ensure that the organisation's independence and neutrality are not compromised. These guidelines should cover issues such as the types of activities that can be funded by private entities and the conditions that may be attached to such funding. c. Establishing an independent oversight body to monitor the use of private funding: Interpol should establish an independent oversight body, with representatives from civil society, to monitor the use of private funding and ensure that it is being used in accordance with Interpol's guidelines and the principles of transparency, accountability, and impartiality. 2. Strengthening Oversight of the Issuance of Red Notices Another area of concern regarding Interpol's operations is the lack of oversight surrounding the issuance of Red Notices. Red Notices are a type of international arrest warrant issued by Interpol at the request of a member country. However, there have been instances where Red Notices have been used for political purposes, raising concerns about the potential for abuse. To address this concern, Interpol should strengthen its oversight of the issuance of Red Notices by: a. Implementing more rigorous criteria for the issuance of Red Notices: Interpol should establish more rigorous criteria for the issuance of Red Notices to ensure that they are only used for legitimate law enforcement purposes. This could include requiring member countries to provide detailed evidence supporting their request for a Red Notice and requiring that requests be reviewed by an independent panel of experts. b. Enhancing transparency around the issuance of Red Notices: Interpol should increase its transparency around the issuance of Red Notices by publishing detailed information about the criteria used to assess requests for Red Notices, the number of Red Notices issued, and the reasons for their issuance. c. Establishing an independent oversight body to review requests for Red Notices: Interpol should establish an independent oversight body, with representatives from civil society, to review requests for Red Notices and ensure that they are being issued for legitimate law enforcement purposes and not for political purposes. 3. Enhancing Public Accountability Finally, to enhance public accountability and increase public trust in Interpol, the organisation should take steps to enhance its public accountability by: a. Strengthening its engagement with civil society: Interpol should strengthen its engagement with civil society by establishing regular consultations with non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and other stakeholders to discuss issues related to transparency and accountability. b. Increasing its public reporting: Interpol should increase its public reporting on its activities, including its budget and financial statements, to provide greater transparency around its operations. c. Establishing a complaints mechanism: Interpol should establish a complaints mechanism to enable members of the public to report any concerns they have about the organisation's activities, including its use of private funding. d. Compensating victims who have been unfairly listed on Interpol’s database. The international community must remain vigilant to ensure that Interpol remains an impartial and effective organisation that serves the interests of justice and the rule. Interpol, therefore, must welcome input from the broader stakeholders who are impacted by how Interpol operates, if the organisation is to maintain credibility and the cooperation of member nations. Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

The international community is questioning America's justice system for what is seen as unequal application of the law in New York’s indictment of President Trump. America is being branded as hypocritical for exporting “democracy” to “autocratic” states when a substantial portion of foreigners see America as weaponising its judicial system against political opposition. The American system is politicised to levels unseen in other democratic countries. Judges are appointed on the basis of their political leanings, Attorney General’s are elected on their political promises, and prosecutors go after targets who will enhance their political careers. We might think that’s America’s mess to sort out but the problem is when the US decides its jurisdiction doesn’t end at its own borders. America has legitimised its ability to indict foreigners for crimes committed outside of America by non-American persons simply because other countries allow it. There are numerous examples of America indicting foreigners and that’s fine, they can indict all they want. The issue is when foreign jurisdictions agree to extradite individuals to the US, people who have perhaps never even been to the country, people who have not committed a crime in the jurisdiction where they live and who haven't violated international law. Why should foreigners need to check local American laws before they act? In respect of Julian Assange, a simple test to determine whether extradition is unethical would be to ask what the UK would do if another country attempted the same. If China sought to extradite Julian Assange for exposing their regime’s violations despite him not doing it in China, would we allow extradition? No, and the same can be said for other allied nations. If I exposed Saudi wrongdoing from the US, would I be extradited to Saudi? No. Saudi, the UAE and China have no right to dictate that I abide by their laws. If you live in the UK and abide by British law, that is the only law you should be required to abide by. Sure, if you violate Saudi rules from the UK and voluntarily return to Saudi, you might be punished but the UK should not extradite you. The same can be said in Julian Assange’s case. The US should aim to persuade allied countries to make legislative changes that would support US policies but they should not be able to enforce their own laws onto people who do not live in America and who are not American. Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

Originally published at Great Companies Great Companies: How did you get your idea or concept for the business? Radha Stirling: Since 2008, I have been asked by victims of wrongful Interpol reporting to assist them to clear their names and protect them from unfair extradition requests. ‘Interpol abuse’ became so prevalent that I found it necessary to open an organisation dedicated to saving victims from human rights abuses. Innocent individuals have been listed on Interpol, arrested, detained and tried for “crimes” that don’t even meet Interpol’s minimum reporting criteria. Journalists, activists, businessmen and credit card debtors have been locked up in Western nations at the mere request of countries who repeatedly take advantage of their membership with Interpol. It was a clear expansion of my human rights work to focus on lobbying for long term reform of the Interpol Red Notice and extradition procedures. Countries like the UAE, Saudi, Qatar, Bahrain, Iran, Turkey, Venezuela, South Korea, Russia, Egypt and China have been able to use the crime tool for their own personal vendettas. IPEX seeks to eliminate this practice. Great Companies: What are the various services provided by IPEX (Interpol & Extradition) Reform? Radha Stirling: IPEX seeks to advise, lobby, and achieve urgently needed reforms in Interpol’s internal procedures for data collection and the issuance of diffusion Notices, as well as to improve Interpol’s overall transparency and accountability so that the organisation’s crucial function in global law enforcement will no longer be compromised by abuse and manipulation; and so that no more innocent individuals will suffer the devastating consequences of being wrongfully included in Interpol’s database. IPEX provides Interpol removal and prevention services, extradition defence, reputation management and recovery from the damage such a wrongful abuse of the system can cause. Great Companies: What makes IPEX (Interpol & Extradition) Reform different from hundreds of other similar service providers? Radha Stirling: CEO Radha Stirling has been a leading voice against Interpol abuse, having pursued the call for greater Interpol transparency and reforms to end abuse by an emerging “authoritarian nexus” which misuses the Interpol Red Notice system to circumvent due process. With her 15 years experience, she is an expert witness in the field, who works with politicians, enforcement authorities, legislators and the media to ensure accountability within the organisation. Stirling is spearheading the first class action against the seemingly immune Lyon based agency. Great Companies: What were the struggles and challenges you faced and how did you overcome them? Radha Stirling: When taking on an international enforcement agency with diplomatic immunity backed by powerful authoritarian states, and with zero incentive to comply with United Nations principles in respect of human rights, it’s never going to be easy. Interpol has lacked not only transparency but also accountability. They have seen the abuse of their system and the suffering of individuals as ‘collateral damage’. They haven’t wanted to rock the boat of any member states (donors) in case it impacts their income. Campaigning for individuals and highlighting these ongoing abuses to the point where reform becomes a priority has been more than a decade’s work but with perseverance, change is inevitable. Highlighting case after case to the media and working with influential think tanks and political figures to push the issue with legislators is an ongoing project that has begun to bear fruit. Great Companies: How do you plan to grow in the future? What does 5 years down the line look like for IPEX (Interpol & Extradition) Reform? Radha Stirling: We’re working on some groundbreaking projects and lawsuits that will ultimately force Interpol to review protocols to protect individuals from abuse. As part of these endeavours, we are to recommend international protocols and procedures that member countries should adhere to when considering extradition requests. We anticipate such measures will reduce the prevalence of wrongful arrests, wrongful extraditions and human rights abuses. Great Companies: If you had one piece of advice to someone just starting out, what would it be? Radha Stirling: Choose a business that you’re passionate about, that you’re naturally drawn to, that doesn’t feel like work to you and that builds your sense of self esteem. Write down your goals regularly and practice self discipline. If you can imagine it, you can do it. Interpol Red Notice - Press Pack - Download your free Media and information pack on Interpol Abuse, produced by leading expert Radha Stirling, one of the most prominent voices against Interpol abuse since 2008. Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

Despite the fact that Saudi Arabia and Iran have been engaging in talks for several months, no one was prepared for the dramatic announcement that the two countries would resume diplomatic ties. The international community was even less prepared for the fact that the Saudi-Iran deal was brokered by China. While the rapprochement between the two traditional rivals in the Gulf is objectively positive, and had been hailed as an epochal turning point in the region by world leaders; there are concerns about what the agreement – and the negotiations that led to it – reveals about the declining influence of the United States, and by extension, Europe, in the Middle East. The Biden Administration’s response to the announcement was conspicuously muted, with the US president saying good relations are “better for everybody”, and White House Spokesman John Kirby somewhat sheepishly assuring journalists that the US had been kept “in the loop” regarding the historic talks between the Saudis and Iranians. To put this blasé response in perspective: the United States has been the major mediator in the Middle East for at least the past 50 years; they have no fewer than 18 military bases and around 40,000 troops permanently located in the region. Just last week, US officials unveiled a new set of sanctions against Iran. A spokesperson for U.S. Central Command, or CENTCOM, said earlier this month that “Iran remains the leading source of instability in the region and is a threat to the United States and our partners.” Yet, the United States was simply “in the loop” on negotiations? It is undeniably worrying that deals are being struck without American or Western participation involving three undemocratic regimes to reshape the landscape of power in one of the most strategic regions in the world. This is particularly true when two of those regimes – China and Iran -- take openly aggressive postures towards the West, and the third – Saudi Arabia – has become increasingly indifferent to American and European interests. While of course everyone would like to see regional tensions subside, we must ask ourselves what fruits can be borne from the collaboration of three authoritarian regimes with notorious human rights records when there is no democratic moderator? I have long warned that an authoritarian nexus was being created between repressive states around the world, building a parallel and competing political jurisdiction outside the rule of law, excluding Western governments, and averse to democratic values and human rights. Heading Detained in Dubai and Due Process International, I have seen how countries like Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar, for example, circumvent or manipulate international protocols and institutions to pursue dissidents abroad, or to punish foreign citizens over petty financial disputes through abuse of Interpol; jurisdiction shopping for countries willing to comply with illegitimate extradition demands. I have supported clients detained in countries at the request of Gulf states or North Korea for alleged offences that would not pass muster in any Western court of law. I have seen how the UAE shunned diplomatic norms to coordinate a joint attack with India against an American-flagged private vessel in international waters by trading favours with the Indian prime minister over the phone. By cultivating this network of willing renegade regimes, these countries – like Iran, China, and Saudi Arabia – are building a support system that insulates them from Western influence. This can only further deteriorate the human rights conditions prevailing under each participating government. It is an informal alliance of impunity. In my work, exposing abuses in these countries to international, and particularly Western scrutiny, is often the only means for securing justice for victims; so, it is deeply concerning that the West is becoming increasingly side-lined. If the United States and Europe allow their importance to diminish in the Middle East, with China surpassing them in relevance; no amount of Western outrage over human rights abuses, torture, false imprisonment, and wrongful convictions will have an impact. China and the UAE: The Long Game China is playing the long game and if left unchallenged, will secure Beijing's control over the global economy for the next century. The US, the UK, and Europe cannot afford to simply be “in the loop” when it comes to the Middle East, particularly when those countries are hard-selling themselves to the West as destinations for investment and tourism. It is simply too dangerous for Western visitors if their home countries have no standing in the eyes of the Gulf States to prevent abuse. We can applaud the Iran-Saudi agreement as an historic turning point in the region, but what we will be hailing, if we are being honest, is the retreat of Western influence in the Middle East, and that is more ominous than inspiring. Tourism in Saudi Arabia too risky Saudi Arabia’s de facto ruler, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is a dangerous figure. Equal parts despot, dictator, mafia-style don, but also political and social reformer; he is attempting to bend the kingdom to his will... Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

A common question of former UAE expats and one that should be asked before travel: Countless people over the years have been arrested when transiting through Dubai for reasons ranging from credit card or utility debts to employer absconding cases and landlord disputes. Some of these debts have been more than 20 years old while others are simple administrative errors (payments not properly recorded). Some unfortunate travellers have been taken from their seats on the plane while in transit. Arrests occur whether the traveller clears through immigration, remains in the airport or even on the plane. Resolving these issues can be costly and lengthy and it is advisable to avoid transit altogether or to conduct a status check in advance. Contact policecheck@detainedindubai.org with any questions. Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

On the 30th of January, Detained in Dubai celebrated its 15th anniversary in London with friends, clients and members of the media and legal community. It was truly an honour to have so many wonderful people join us for such a special occasion and we thank everyone for their support. Lord Clement Jones has advocated for British citizens wrongfully detained abroad. We were privileged to hear his powerful words of support for Dubai prisoners and for our organisation’s work. His Lordship has tirelessly advocated for Ryan Cornelius, Charles Ridley and has now come to learn about Albert Douglas, who shares a cell with Ryan and Charles. "We are truly grateful to have the support of an esteemed member of the House of Lords", added Radha Stirling, CEO of Detained in Dubai. See Lord Clement Jones & Radha Stirling on BBC Albert’s son Wolfgang passionately told the harrowing story of his father’s wrongful detention and torture, a shocking representation of what lies behind the “glamorous” tourist destination. "Wolfgang has been tirelessly advocating for his innocent father's release from Dubai jail. He will never give up, we love his passion and we love him," said Ms Stirling. HOME | Albert Douglas Albert Douglas, wrongfully detained in Duabi and subject to grave human rights abuses within the UAE prison system. #FreeAlbert is a campaign solely dedicated to getting Albert home and ending torture in the Emirates. John Glendinning arrived from Scotland, delivering an emotional speech after his brother Brian was released from an Iraqi prison. He was held over a small Qatar bank debt. In celebrating Brian’s release, we were reminded that others like Hussein Yactine remain locked up in foreign jails over small bank debts, a violation of Interpol’s charter. Brian has been desperately trying to help former cellmate, Hussein, get home. Stirling was elated to finally meet John in person after spending day and night on the phone to him during Brian's incarceration,"It was an absolute pleasure to work intensely with Brian's family to secure his freedom but as Brian says, there are still dozens of people detained abroad and the fight goes on. I look forward to seeing Brian and his family in Scotland later this year. They are forever my friends". Scots dad locked up in Iraq for months launches fight for cellmate to be freed - Daily Record Brian Glendinning, 43, was in jail for more than two months in Baghdad after he was arrested at Basrah airport when he arrived to start a new job in September. Professor John Cooper, KC highlighted the organisation’s ongoing battle for justice against powerful governments. With challenges ranging from Israeli spy companies and PR agencies deployed against Radha Stirling and her clients, to the heavy task of recruiting foreign governmental and diplomatic support and to saving people in life and death situations. Stirling previously worked with Cooper during the Princess Latifa fiasco, "John is a remarkable KC, author, professor and friend. His passionate speech was deeply appreciated as is his ongoing support for myself, for justice and for our organisation. Many attendees were unaware of some of the horrendous cases Detained in Dubai has seen over the years. Veteran Perry Coppins spoke of the time he spent in prison and how it has subsequently impacted his life. Perry was locked up for prescription medicine, until a kind doctor told him to call “Detained in Dubai”. “I was out three days later”, he told the room. Radha has been friends with Perry ever since his release. "It was so good to see Perry in person again. His experience in the UAE had a terrible impact on his life. His story was very emotional for those who had only heard it for the first time." Briton 'freed' in Dubai after being found with 'too many pills' - BBC News Perry Coppins said was stopped by customs officials in the United Arab Emirates for having "too many pills" on him. In the audience was fellow veteran Andy Neal who was detained and abused by UAE authorities for a year before being finally exonerated. Stirling advocated for Andy's release after he was wrongfully arrested by Dubai police and their 'wide net' policies. "It was a blessing to meet Andy for the first time in person and for him to share his story with so many. It's disturbing that the countless people who are wrongfully detained in the UAE and subsequently released, do not receive compensation nor even an apology. Their mistreatment and abuse leaves permanent scars but the experience is just swept under the rug by Emirati authorities and by our own governments". Stirling, along with Baroness Whitaker, have lobbied the British government to increase travel warnings as a means to encourage local UAE reform. British soldier is CLEARED after spending a year in UAE prisons on false drugs charges | Daily Mail Online Andy Neal, 44, has been cleared of all charges after he was arrested in October 2018 by Dubai police on false drug charges. The father-of-two spent over a year in prisons across the UAE. Entrepreneur and author Marek Zmyslowsk spoke about his thrilling fight against a wrongful Interpol Red Notice. Marek’s life was forever touched and he is an ongoing advocate against Interpol abuse. For a tale of criminal gangs in Nigeria, of powerful enemies and life as an international fugitive, read Marek’s autobiography, Chasing Black Unicorns: How building the Amazon of Africa put me on Interpol's Most Wanted list. A number of former Interpol “fugitives” were present and ever supportive of IPEX Reform, Stirling’s organisation that lobbies for Interpol and extradition reform. Marek Zmyslowski – I build Companies outside the First World, so it becomes First. It was wonderful to hear from Mr André Gauthier and his son Alexis who joined the celebration from Quebec, Canada. André was scapegoated by powerful elites in the Gold AE scam. After an intense fight against the dozens of charges against him, he was fully exonerated. André is writing a book detailing the intrigue of his business and detention in Dubai. Stirling met him for the first time in person. "I was so happy André and his son Alexis made the trip from Canada to join our celebration. His case and the details of the Gold AE scam are shocking and I can't wait to read his book. His release was negotiated with the support of the media, the Canadian government and UAE diplomats." After years detained in Dubai, falsely-accused Quebecer is grateful to be home | CBC News Gauthier's family maintains he was a whistleblower who alerted authorities in the United Arab Emirates to irregular dealings in a gold-trading company and then was arrested for the fraud himself. Celebrity detective David Swindle joined us from Scotland to speak at the event. His work investigating deaths abroad, helping bereaved families seek justice is paramount to victims of crime. David frequently appears in documentaries and on television. He is the senior investigator who brought serial killer Peter Tobin to justice. David is touring the UK all year in “The Makings of a Murderer” - Investigating The UK’s Most Notorious Serial Killers and we have no doubt you will enjoy the show! Finally, attendees learned the organisation was founded after former “big brother boss” Cat Le-Huy was detained in Dubai. If it weren’t for Cat’s 7 week long detention for melatonin pills, 20,000 people would not have been helped by Detained in Dubai. Cat Le-Huey. "It's hard to imagine how my life may have turned out if I wasn't thrust into my position at Detained in Dubai, but I am ever grateful to Cat for enduring that seven weeks in Al Wathba. Without that taunting experience, thousands more would have suffered. Our angel". Dubai has a dark secret of medieval injustice... the princess is only the start, writes GUY ADAMS | Daily Mail Online GUY ADAMS: The princess is under armed guard, recently smuggling out remarkable videos telling how she had been seized by commandos while in international waters. Radha Stirling – A Leading Human Rights Advocate Dedicated to Help Victims of Injustice | CIO VIEWS We are ever grateful to those who shared our event last week including members of British media, lawyers, litigation funders and friends. With your support, our work is made possible. Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

Indian citizens are more likely to be imprisoned in the UAE than in any other country in the world. “There are over 8,000 Indian nationals incarcerated in foreign jails,” says Radha Stirling, CEO of Due Process International and founder of Detained in Dubai, “Roughly half of them are imprisoned in Gulf countries, with the highest number being in the UAE.” Indians constitute roughly one-third of the Emirates’ total population, but Stirling says the alarming incarceration rate is not explained merely by demographic representation; but that the UAE justice system is fundamentally biased, and citizens of India are particularly vulnerable to false arrest. “There are approximately the same number of Indian nationals living in the United States, yet there are fewer than 300 Indian prisoners; and that in a country with the highest overall incarceration rate on earth. There are 2.5 million Indian citizens in a country like Malaysia, many of whom come from the same socioeconomic strata as those who migrate to the UAE, but Malaysia only has around 400 Indian prisoners. There are even fewer Indian citizens jailed in Pakistan than in the Emirates. There is clearly a systemic problem in the UAE criminal justice system that disproportionately targets citizens from the sub-continent. “As political and economic ties between India and the UAE have grown over the past decade, so has the frequency of false arrests, arbitrary detentions, deportations, and Interpol abuse against Indian nationals by the UAE”, Stirling explains, “While one would normally expect better relations to be accompanied by greater respect, the opposite has occurred. We are not only talking about blue-collar labourers being targeted by the police – workers with no real rights or protections – as we used to see 15 or 20 years ago; today, it is just as common for high level Indian investors and professionals to be wrongfully prosecuted and hounded by abusive Interpol Red Notices over financial or contractual disputes. “The pattern we have noted over our 15 years in the field, is that the UAE tends to see its relative economic and political usefulness to its allies as a licence to mistreat its allies’ citizens. The more the UAE becomes vital as a trading or strategic partner to a country, the more that country’s people are at risk in the Emirates. This has been the case for the United Kingdom, for the US, and it is increasingly true for India.” Stirling says that the UAE habitually uses the Interpol system for data collection as a tool for harassment and as a method to expand its de facto jurisdiction by requesting abusive Red Notices, “The UAE is one of the worst offenders when it comes to Interpol abuse. Not only are they among Interpol’s top funders, they successfully campaigned to win the Interpol presidency for Emirati Ahmed Naser Al-Raisi, who is himself under investigation for torture and human rights abuse. We deal with hundreds of cases every year where a foreign national has been wronged in a financial or business dispute with a local, falsely accused and wrongfully convicted in absentia, who is then listed on Interpol ostensibly to pursue extradition. These disputes are not criminal in nature, and the absentia convictions are completely rejected according to international norms of due process; but the UAE essentially uses Red Notice to extort victims by bringing their lives and businesses to a screeching halt through an Interpol listing. They are treated as wanted fugitives and detained at all ports of entry wherever they go, usually just to satisfy a vindictive Emirati ex-business partner or local bank that does not want to reschedule payments on a loan. We have seen a significant surge in precisely these types of cases involving Indian investors and entrepreneurs in the UAE. The Emirates appears to believe it is too important to India for New Delhi to protest this mistreatment, and it appears they are correct.” Risky Business for Indians in the UAE With an estimated 2 million migrants, Indians form easily the largest expat population in the UAE. They are an integral part of the business community, the labor force, and the society as a whole. Living and working in the UAE offers Indian expats many opportunities to prosper, and this has made the Emirates a very popular destination. However, Indians face the same potential for legal problems as any other expat group. Substantial Increase in Legal Problems for White Collar Indians in the UAE, including Interpol & Extradition The UAE is composed of many nationalities, though Indians form over 50% of the total population in the UAE. 20% of Indian expats are working in professional employment with a great number of entrepreneurs establishing businesses in a flourishing economy. Due Process Newsroom & Media Centre Stirling says that 8 years ago approximately 20% of Detained in Dubai’s financial dispute and Interpol clients were Indian nationals in the UAE, today she says they are the majority. “Well over half of the Interpol abuse cases stemming from business or debt-related issues involve Indian citizens,” She explains, “These can pertain to minor disputes or cases in which million-dollar companies have been destroyed, sabotaged, or seized by Emirati partners. We have clients who were close advisors to ruling families, and people who literally helped build the economy of the UAE over the course of decades – there is no exemption or preferential treatment afforded to Indian citizens regardless of their contribution to the country or their economic status; and unfortunately, the consular support of the Indian Embassy has become increasingly hands-off.” Recent rulings in India curtail the likelihood of extradition to the UAE, Stirling says, however, Indian authorities can still prosecute the accused locally if the charges are also considered crimes in India. “Most UAE Red Notices arise from financial disputes, debts, or bounced-cheques, which Emirati authorities creatively frame as fraud, this is also a criminal offence in India. Thus, even if India will not extradite citizens to the UAE, they will prosecute locally based on the UAE’s mischaracterisation of the disputes. The backlog of court cases in India is enormous and someone can be subjected to years of proceedings, or even years of remand incarceration, before ever settling such matters; all as the result of an abusive UAE Red Notice.” Stirling’s organisation offers an Interpol Prevention service to clients to help them avoid the issuance of a wrongful Red Notice, as well as Interpol Removal expertise to appeal against Notices that have already been issued. “We are proud to have a 100% success rate in having abusive Red Notices deleted from Interpol’s database,” She says, “We have developed a good working relationship with Interpol over the years, and are intimately familiar with the UAE’s evolving methods for abusing the system. Indian nationals need to be aware of the risks they face in the Emirates, but if and when they do encounter problems, we have a long track record of providing solutions.” Radha Stirling - Outlook Magazine Feature 2021 - Inspiring Leaders by Radha Stirling - Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

Following a high-profile campaign to secure the freedom of Egyptian-American Sherif Osman after his arrest in Dubai over his criticism of the Egyptian government, Detained in Dubai announced today that Osman has returned home to the United States. The Egyptian-born US citizen was detained on holiday in the UAE last month over an extradition request by the Egyptian government because of his online criticisms of the regime of Abdel-Fatah El Sisi and his support for protests during the recent COP27 gathering in Sharm el-Sheikh. He was detained since early November and faced imminent deportation to Egypt where human rights activists feared his life would be in danger. “There is no doubt that Sherif would have faced serious risk of abuse in Egyptian custody,” explained Radha Stirling, CEO of Detained in Dubai, who led the campaign for Osman’s release. Sherif Osman case highlights America’s dwindling influence in the Middle East “His arrest was appalling,” She said, “Sherff was detained for social media content he published in the United States, under his constitutionally-protected right to free speech; yet he was arrested by the UAE, an American ally, with the objective of extraditing him to Egypt, another American ally; where he would have been thrown into a prison system notorious for abuse of political dissidents, and where one American had already lost his life in custody. “We engaged not only the media and American consular officials on Sherif’s behalf, but also with his congressional representatives; urging the intervention of the US government to prevent his deportation and bring Sherif home. Dubai authorities were intent upon his extradition until his case garnered international attention, and we are extremely grateful for the diplomatic efforts the US undertook to secure his freedom once they became aware of Sherif’s plight.” Stirling hails progress in detention of American over Egypt criticism Osman had earlier been released on bail in Dubai after weeks in detention pending authorities’ decision on his deportation. “We believe the UAE paused the extradition process after the case reached the media and American officials became involved,” Stirling explained, “Without the scrutiny of the international press, and the concerted effort of campaigners, Sherif’s deportation would likely have been carried out within days of his arrest. Almost 400 people have been extradited from the Emirates in the last 2 years, and Egypt and the UAE have a very strong relationship, so, we regarded Sherif’s case with the utmost urgency. Over half of the population of Egypt’s jails are political prisoners; torture and abuse are routine; Sherif’s life would have been in danger had his deportation not been averted.” The full details of Osman’s release and return to the US have not been disclosed and the small business owner and social media commentator still needs time to convalesce with his family and recover from his ordeal. “We are immensely relieved that Sherif is finally home,” Stirling said, “This has been a traumatic time for him and his loved ones; it should never have happened, and we hope that the authorities in the US will take steps to ensure that the same thing never happens again to another American citizen.” Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

Brian Glendinning returned home to Scotland after being detained in an Iraqi jail over a Qatar issued Interpol Red Notice for debt. After extensive campaigning, he was finally released and avoided what was set to be at least two years in prison. His welcomed return to Scotland though, has left him feeling immense sadness for his 36 year old cellmate, Hussein Yactine, who helped him survive the ordeal. Hussein has been in detention in Iraq for over one year for the same reasons as Brian, a Qatar bank debt. The pair still communicate frequently after Brian promised not to forget him. “Hussein doesn’t have the support of his country, Lebanon”, explained Brian, “they don’t have the clout or the inclination to help citizens wrongfully detained abroad and Hussein’s helpless against this unjust process. I could easily have been in his shoes if it weren’t for the legal and diplomatic efforts made on my behalf. I was lucky and I think everyone knows how unfair my detention was. It seems shocking to me that our country has supported Qatar’s rise while they continue to violate international treaties and protocols on human rights issues”. Brian told the BBC that Brits should not be supporting the World Cup and should avoid visiting or investing in Qatar. “If a private commercial bank has the ability to have foreigners locked up abroad even though it’s against Interpol’s protocols and against UN directives, nobody should feel safe”, added Brian. When Brian was released from prison, Hussein put a handwritten note in his bag which read “Congrats bro because you left from here. I’m really happy that you’re going to your country to see your wife and kids. I hope you will never forget your friend, Hussein”. In a recorded telephone call, Hussein pleaded with Brian “I need your help. I can not stay here any more. My month is long, nobody is helping, nobody is doing anything. I hope your friend Radha can help me. I have family, three kids, I don’t have anybody, you know my situation.” Interpol and Extradition expert Radha Stirling, who represented Brian Glendinning commented “Jailing debtors works for banks, or so they say. When debtors are arrested, banks hope that family members will bail them out but for the most part, family members end up spending their life savings on hefty legal fees. It’s counter-productive but the bank would rather punish their customer than recover the funds owed. In most of these cases, the customer is already in touch with the bank, organising a repayment scheme but they are jailed anyway. These are not fraudsters who took a loan and absconded. Most defaulting customers have hit hard times or suffered a health issue. They genuinely want to repay the loan. They’re not criminals and shouldn’t be treated as such. Interpol is being misused as a debt collector for banks but financial contributions from member states leave the organisation morally bankrupt”. Brian continued, “Hussein was such a support for me while I was in prison. I don’t know if I’d have survived without him. 2 months in Iraq prison was breaking for me and I can’t believe he has already spent a year inside. These banks have no humanity and Brits should avoid Qatar at all costs. People have been jailed over as little as a few thousand pounds and nobody should ever think ‘it can’t happen to me’. Banks add whatever legal fees or interest they want and will quadruple the debt because they have jail hanging over your head”. Brian is calling on the British government to raise this concern with Qatar. “They need to update the law. They can’t keep allowing their ally to jail foreigners abroad. It’s outrageous”. Stirling, who founded the organisation Detained in Doha said she will be in touch with Hussein’s bank and Qatar’s Ministry of Interior. “If Qatar withdraws the extradition request from Iraq, Hussein will be able to return home and seek employment to enable him to continue repayments. There is no benefit to keeping him locked up or extraditing him to lock him up for another few years. It makes no sense. Let him work and let him repay the loan. He has no savings or family to help him and there is no point at all to keep him in prison. We also hope the MOI in Qatar will guide banks to reserve such harsh tactics for genuine financial crime”. Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195