Search Results
144 results found with an empty search
- BBC Radio with Radha Stirling on Qatar extradition request
BBC Scotland interviews Radha Stirling and Kenny MacAskill MP on the arrest of Conor Howard in Corfu, Greece on a Qatar issued Interpol Red Notice. Conor Howard, a young Scottish man has been detained for extradition in Greece and faces deportation to Qatar over an herb grinder found in his luggage while transiting through Doha last year. Radha Stirling, founder of Detained in Dubai and Due Process International has been helping the family. Stirling is an Interpol and Extradition expert specialising in Interpol notices from the Middle East with over a decade's experience. Stirling says Qatar is one of the most prevalent abusers of Interpol's databases and that Western nations should not be making arrests on their behalf. The British government has been lobbied to intervene in this case which Kenny MacAskill emphasises, is not a legal matter but a diplomatic matter. #FreeConor
- Conor Howard, a Scottish man has been detained for extradition in Greece and faces deportation
Veteran lawyer, Secretary for Justice and MP, Kenny MacAskill discusses Conor Howard's detention in Greece over a Qatar arrest warrant with Interpol & Extradition expert Radha Stirling on the Gulf in Justice Podcast Conor Howard, a young Scottish man has been detained for extradition in Greece and faces deportation to Qatar over an herb grinder found in his luggage while transiting through Doha last year. Qatari authorities released him at the time, but inexplicably issued an international arrest warrant against him. He was detained last week in Greece while visiting his parents. Radha speaks with Conor's MP, Kenny MacAskill about the case and what is being done, not only to help Conor, but to ensure that British citizens will no longer be subjected to frivolous Interpol notices issued by abusive countries like Qatar. #ConorHoward #FreeConor
- Radha Stirling: Alan Stevenson catalyst for Interpol reform and human rights compliance
Czech court rules detention of dual British / Australian citizen Alan Stevenson was a violation of human rights; calling into question the legitimacy of Interpol’s Red Notice system due to widespread abuse by authoritarian regimes around the world. Stevenson was held due to claims of unpaid debt in Qatar, despite owing no money. Stirling vows to pursue all legal avenues for justice. Alan’s case is emblematic of what has been happening with ever greater frequency from the Gulf States. Interpol has been hijacked by authoritarian regimes around the world who abuse the Red Notice system to persecute political opponents, dissidents, independent journalists, and private individuals over financial disputes. Countries like Qatar and the UAE lead the world in wrongful Red Notice requests for the purpose of debt collection – something that violates Interpol’s own protocols. In Alan’s case, the claim of unpaid debt was entirely unevidenced, and Qatar did not substantiate the charge when Czech authorities requested proof. Law enforcement officials around the world comply with Red Notices because of their relationship with Interpol, not because of their relationships with the countries requesting the Notices; so, like in Alan’s case, people get detained very often without evidence, simply on the basis of a country’s respect for Interpol. When a Red Notice is subsequently deemed invalid, people whose lives have been turned upside down by detention and extradition procedures are just expected to shrug and move on. By challenging the legality of his detention, Alan is helping to change the state of play with the way countries deal with these Notices. The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic has determined that his incarceration was a violation of his human rights as guaranteed by the UDHR, and they are correct. Interpol has allowed itself to be manipulated, exploited, and used as, essentially, an instrument of financial extortion, not to mention political repression; and this has to stop. Interpol is not vetting Red Notice requests from known abusers of the system, and innocent people are paying the price. Interpol accepted the bogus Red Notice request against Alan from Qatar, and so Czech officials are now guilty of human rights violations because they trusted Interpol. We have been leading the call for years for reform of Interpol’s protocols and for greater transparency. With Alan’s case, we intend to pursue every viable legal option to achieve not only justice and restitution for Alan Stevenson, but the enactment of fundamental changes in how Interpol deals with habitual abusers of the system and those authoritarian member governments with documented gross violations of human rights. Extradition to countries like the UAE, Qatar, Iran, China, Russia, and so on, should be unthinkable; their human rights records are abysmal and their legal systems are starkly below international standards of due process. Yet, they remain eligible for requesting Red Notices, even while in many cases, extradition will mean unjust detention, torture, and potentially death. The stakes are so high, but Interpol has no measures in place to vet requests. Alan’s case can be a watershed moment in this regard. If Interpol reforms, the residual impact could potentially incentivise countries to improve human rights conditions, due process standards, and governmental reforms around the world.
- Interpol abuse spotlighted after Iran Red Notice against Donald Trump
iPEX founder and CEO Radha Stirling specialises in the removal of Interpol Red Notices issued by abusive nations like Iran. Stirling has helped hundreds of Interpol abuse victims over the past decade and has campaigned for reforms to Interpol’s procedures and for sanctions against countries who continue to abuse the system, like Iran, the UAE, Qatar, Russia, China, Egypt and Turkey. Stirling is an expert witness on Interpol abuse in civil and extradition cases, and is part of a working group in DC lobbying for reforms and accountability for wrongful notices. Stirling commented on reports of Trump’s listing with Interpol: “Iran’s attempt to list the President of the United States and others involved in the drone strike that killed General Qassem Soleimani is a fantastic example of how susceptible the international organisation agency is to abuse by its member states. “The only thing Iran has achieved in this instance is showing up how Interpol is perhaps the only policing organisation that should be defunded by the US. The escalation of offensive actions against Americans by countries like China, Qatar, Saudi & the UAE is something that needs to be urgently put in check. Whether it is the planned murder of Americans, the abduction of citizens or the misuse of collaborative crime agency Interpol, the United States needs to end the escalation of aggression against its nationals and make agencies like Interpol accountable. “Iran treats Interpol like its own little politicised police force, to harass, threaten and cause the unfair detention of victims abroad. Iranian beauty queen Bahareh Zare Bahari was detained in the Philippines on the basis of her support for opposition parties and though removed, neither Interpol nor Iran have their lesson. Interpol has zero checks and balances and their members know it. Interpol relies entirely on the member state to voluntarily abide by their charter and their lack of action against regular abusers, has raised allegations of corruption against the controversial agency. “When an Interpol victim challenges an abusive notice, Interpol will review the removal request and after nine months or more, finally remove the notice. They do not, however, sanction the country for repeat abuse which sends a very clear message to member states that Interpol is open for business and it’s a pay to play database. After the controversial arrest of Ms Bahari, Interpol might have considered suspending Iran’s membership but instead, they continue to accept frivolous, politically motivated red notices, leading to human rights violations and lengthy, wrongful detentions abroad. “Iran has issued notices against journalists, football players, businessmen, opposition supporters and now a head of state. In this case, they have succeeded at highlighting the urgent need for the reform of Interpol’s procedures and protocols in accepting notices from nations like Iran. “Interpol is funded by its member states and has little incentive to upset their donors, even if it means innocent victims are arrested or detained unfairly, for “crimes” such as journalism, credit card debts or for countries like Iran who seek to harass and cause individuals harm. “Interpol is already under review and pressure to reform its dangerously abusive procedures, and now they may face sanctions from the States.”
- Emirates Airline layoffs leave pilots & cabin crew at risk of imprisonment or Interpol Red Notices
Summary: Pilots and cabin crew faced employment culling with hundreds let go after coronavirus lockdown. Airline staff face imprisonment and Interpol Red Notices over credit cards, loans and mortgages accrued during their service in the UAE. “It’s like a repeat of 2009, only worse”, said Radha Stirling, CEO of Detained in Dubai. “Last time the economy took a huge hit, pilots and cabin crew were amongst those most affected. Airline staff are actively targeted by big banks in the UAE for easy credit and mortgages, but for many, accepting these offers quickly backfired and turned into a nightmare. “Dubai’s economy is fragile. Any world crisis is going to impact air travel and staff will be laid off promptly, especially in a country where tourism is a major economic contributor. The banks are aware of this, they’ve seen it time and time again, but they themselves get bailed out when they over expose themselves so there’s little incentive for them to be careful.” “To customers, they claim the loans are covered by insurance so it appears quite risk free. If they are made redundant, the bank’s insurance will cover the debt. Why not take out a loan then? Why not take out a mortgage? It seems like a good idea and especially if they end up with a place in the sun! “After the world economic crisis, customers were awoken to the brutal reality that the banks did not care if they were apparently covered by insurance or not. When a customer was laid off by their employer and subsequently pleaded with the bank for an empathetic payment break, they were met with hostile debt collection agencies like Tahseel, who were more than happy to push the defaults all the way to imprisonment which, in fact, is a swift process of only three months. Their thinking is that the threat of jail will sufficiently frighten any relatives who may be able to help the debtor prevent imprisonment. “Of course, the threat of imprisonment only works when the customer remains in the country. 2009 saw a mass exodus of expats, dumping their cars at airports and even abandoning their apartments and villas. The future was uncertain, there was going to be no work and they couldn’t pay their obligations. Whether they left because they were going to become homeless, or whether it was because they knew they could be jailed, the effect on the banks was mass defaults. “Those who remained in the country, gambled that they would find alternative employment before entering into default. It was a huge gamble and the economic impact of the cornonavirus lockdown has been predicted already to surpass the turmoil of 2009. Those who do choose to remain in the country, risk being travel banned over their financial obligations. Hundreds of expats have been travel banned in the UAE over bank debts and the problem is, their passports are confiscated, their visas expire and they have no legal permission to work. How is anyone going to repay a bank debt in this situation? They’re not! That’s why we have people like Jonathan Castle and Morag Koussa who have been stuck there for years upon years, separated from their families and at risk of homelessness. “The UAE needs to reassess their approach to financial default. While I understand that loose credit regulations leave the banks open to deliberate fraud, most people are genuine with their intent. Keeping them, effectively prisoners in the country, is detrimental to its growth. It forces expats to abandon ship at the first sign of an economic downturn and the threat of jail means they can’t return if they are offered a new job later. It leaves Dubai counting on fresh blood to keep the wheels in motion, a bit like a Ponzi scheme. Eventually it runs out of steam. “Expats don’t really feel longevity in Dubai, not when their security can be so easily ripped from beneath them at the click of a finger. This is something the UAE needs to work on if they want to attract leading talent on a longer term basis. “Airline staff have already been laid off, with many more expecting to be next in line. Just in the past few days, I’ve received calls and emails from cabin crew nervous about what will happen next. They know they won’t be able to meet their financial obligations and face being out of employment indefinitely and are seeking advice on whether they will be listed on Interpol’s database as a fugitive. The answer is likely yes. “Most business sectors are suffering from the worldwide coronavirus frenzy and prolonged lockdown and when they leave the UAE, and leave their mortgages, loans and credit cards, the banks will resort to secondary enforcement tactics. They’ve missed out on firing their primary weapon, that of jail, so will resort to their backup arsenal, harassment and the dreaded Interpol Red Notice; for pilots, this is a nightmare! “Over the past decade, we have worked on unbelievable cases of criminal harassment from the banks and their agents. The extent that they are willing to go to is unfathomable to most, often even from branches of major international banks that would never be able to get away with this behaviour from their Western branches. The banks have either themselves, or through debt collection agencies, systematically harassed customers, their families and their new employers, often causing their termination, something one might consider counter-productive to recovering any monies owed. Nevertheless, they do not want a reputation for weakness to be perpetuated over the world. “On occasion, banks have flown staff out to turn up in person and try to meet with a customer. Emirates NBD I recall, flew a manager to meet with an Emirates captain at an airport in Germany to discuss his mortgage. They wouldn’t negotiate a reduction in his payments and preferred to report him to Interpol’s database. Fortunately for him, he was not flying internationally at the time but was stunned when later, he became a simulator instructor in Madrid and one day, found himself in a Spanish police station wondering why on earth the policía were treating him like an international fugitive. Over a mortgage? Really? “In Italy, an Emirates flight attendant was arrested on the basis of an Interpol Red Notice in Rome. She was detained for several days and processed for extradition, as though she were a mafia boss. Unbelievably, it was for a small credit card debt. She was placed under house arrest in a hotel, paid for by her, while she endured a lengthy trial. Ultimately, the extradition request was denied. But did the banks really want her returned to Dubai? No, they wanted to harass her and use the Interpol arrest warrant to pressure her into payments she simply couldn’t afford. If she couldn’t afford it then, she certainly couldn’t afford it after being slammed with legal and hotel bills. She is now awaiting to be removed from Interpol’s database and ridiculously, was just last week, surrounded by eight Italian polizia at a hotel restaurant because the notice’s removal is still being processed. She was mortified, embarrassed and rightfully angry at the bank. We are now looking at legal action against the bank. It is time they are made accountable. “Interpol can take up to nine months or more to remove notices, and there are no checks and balances when a red notice is issued from the UAE. To fit in with their reporting rules, banks will change the category from “debt” to “fraud” to ensure their notice is listed. They are effectively using Interpol as their own free debt collection and harassment agent. We have made Interpol aware of abusive practices, but they are heavily funded by countries like the UAE and Qatar and currently have no disciplinary procedures in place for abusive member states. “I fully expect to see a repeat of the devastation caused in 2009 and have cautioned expats to vacate the country rather than risking being jailed or travel banned. It is important to be proactive in addressing debt but, keep in mind, that the banks can be sneaky and once in default, they are no longer your friend. Once employment is terminated, bank customers should leave very quickly, before the employer notifies the bank. The mere notification of employment termination has caused banks to unfairly and suddenly call in loans or issue travel bans. “Businesspeople are also advised that banks are prone to unfairly calling in loans, simply because they need to increase their cash reserves. This can cause businesses to default and travel bans be issued for the Directors. Finally, those who stayed behind in 2009 in hope of salvaging their businesses or mitigating their exposure to banks, put themselves at risk of imprisonment for bounced cheques or defaults. There was no consideration for their goodwill and intents taken into account when they were sent to jail. Be diligent, foresee the risks and resolve business and finance issues from the safety of your own country.” Detained in Dubai was founded in 2008, helping and advising people in financial and commercial matters, litigation, Interpol and extradition.
- An Etihad Airways Flight Attendant Faces Jail Time for $100,000 Cryptocurrency Loan Default
"A former member of Etihad Airways cabin crew who recently lost his job in a wave of redundancies because of the COVID-19 pandemic says he faces being sent to jail because he can no longer afford the repayments on a $100,000 loan used to invest in Bitcoin at the height of the cryptocurrency craze. The 34-year-old French national says he is expected to pay back $2,230 every month until the end of 2021 to clear the 338,000 Dirham loan. Unlike many countries, failing to repay a debt is a criminal offence in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) where debtors could be sent to jail for up to three years. The British charity, Detained in Dubai (which helps in criminal cases across the UAE) say they have witnessed an uptick in what they describe as “aggressive” tactics from banks which include criminal enforcement. In the past, expat residents had fled to their home country to renegotiate debt in relative safety but Radha Stirling, the chief executive of Detained in Dubai says there’s been an “upswing in the amount of Interpol threats” for expat debtors who return home to avoid unpaid loans. “Using Interpol to detain and extradite debtors to the UAE people is not legal, but the UAE banks know that most victims don’t know how to fight the Red Notice or avoid it altogether,” she says. “In fact, the first many former expats learn about Red Notices is when they are detained at an airport.” For the unnamed Etihad flight attendant, the story began in late 2017 when he took out the huge loan with Emirates Islamic Bank to make his first-ever investment in Bitcoin. At the time, the cryptocurrency was at an all-time high but within less than a year, he claims he had lost 85 per cent on his initial investment. Both he had and his wife have lost their jobs with Etihad Airways and she can’t afford to repay an unrelated debt. Last year, it emerged that potentially hundreds of Emirates cabin crew had lost hundreds of thousands of dollars in a Ponzi-style investment scam. Investors were promised returns of between 5 and 20 per cent when they opened an account with a deposit of at least $10,000 – some victims invested over $100,000 in the scam but lost everything." Full article available at: PaddleYourOwnKanoo
- British father, 36, held in UAE while on holiday after £420,000 debt was racked up in his name
".... CEO [of Detained in Dubai] and lawyer Radha Stirling said: “Atif went to the UAE trusting in a job opportunity. He trusted that the UAE has checks in place to safeguard against unscrupulous fraudsters. On all points, the Emirates let him down. How can anyone have confidence in the UAE as a destination for expat professionals, when a job application can turn into identity theft, and the victim himself is prosecuted?” Ms Stirling is calling on the FCO to coordinate with counterparts in the UAE to get the charges against Atif dismissed, and is urging Dubai authorities to expedite his return home. “There are transactions in the UAE when he was on honeymoon in Bali, and since he has been home in Aylesbury,” she said. “The police and the prosecutors know perfectly well that Atif has been victimised, yet they continue to compound his victimisation by not allowing him to go home.” Full article available at iNews
- “Bahrain seeks to punish Hakeem through extradition process and show strength to gulf allies”
We’ve made it quick and convenient for you to manage your blog from anywhere. In this blog post we’ll share the ways you can post to your Wix Blog. The disturbing news has broken that Bahrain intends to continue with the extradition request of Australian resident, Bahraini refugee and pro footballer Mr Hakeem Alaraibi. Bahrain has not responded to the international campaign and media pressure to withdraw their application, and Thailand has seemingly not sought a diplomatic resolution with Bahrain, a solution that is still available to Thai authorities. The unfair detention of Mr Alaraibi is placing intense strain on Australia’s long term relationship with Thailand, as many high profile individuals, groups and key politicians seek his immediate return to Australia. Australian national Radha Stirling, founder of Detained in Dubai and expert witness in extradition and Interpol cases who is supporting the campaign to #SaveHakeem, said “While Thailand continues to allow the judicial procedure to unfold, the country risks its own reputation and its tourism industry being dragged down by a gulf nation notorious for human rights abuses, torture and unfair detentions.” Had Bahrain made the decision to withdraw its request at the early stages of arrest, Hakeem would have been free to return to Australia and the consequences for Bahrain would have been minimal; Instead, Bahrain has made the deliberate decision to push for extradition, even against its own interests with Western allies. Stirling said “Middle Eastern countries notoriously push for full extradition trials, even where they are fully aware that they will lose such a request. They do this as a means to punish individuals like Hakeem, to set an example to other would-be activists, or to show their power to gulf allies. In some instances, they simply do not wish to admit that the request was wrong or that they have flaws in their own judicial process, or admit they engaged in Interpol abuse. Middle Eastern countries often vacillate between allying themselves with Western interests or rallying the support of gulf neighbours. Bahrain does not wish to lose face amongst their Arab friends”. Although it has already been determined that the Interpol notice was in violation of Interpol’s own rules, its withdrawal and cancelation does not mean the extradition request will be withdrawn. Extradition requests can be made directly to another country in the absence of a Red Notice. Ms Stirling commented “As it was the Red Notice that caused his arrest, Interpol’s lack of a formal process to prevent such a notice being listed renders them open to precedent-setting legal action and when Hakeem is finally free, I would encourage him to take such action to force accountability on Interpol for their negligence”. In most Western countries, in a situation such as Hakeem’s, bail would be granted to the individual facing extradition. This is largely due to the fact that Western nations have become aware of Middle Eastern nations misuse of Interpol & Extradition proceedings as a means to harass or intimidate victims, and because these same countries are aware that an extradition is unlikely given the expectation of unfair trials, human rights violations and torture. Radha Stirling has appeared for the defence in a number of extradition requests from Middle Eastern countries. Stirling says “In almost all cases, bail was granted throughout proceedings and there is no cause to hold Hakeem in custody; He is not a flight risk, nor a violent offender. He has passed Australia’s most stringent process and successfully sought asylum. It is bad enough that he must face this grave legal abuse, but to not be granted bail in the interim is absurd”. In the event that Thailand does not diplomatically resolve Hakeem’s freedom, the Thai courts may choose at the preliminary hearings to deny Bahrain the option to proceed to a full trial and he may be released once this decision has been made. In the event that Thai courts allow a full trial, Hakeem will be detained in Thailand pending a full hearing, potentially without bail. The question here is whether Thai courts will foresee the extradition request’s failure on the basis of Hakeem’s refugee status and on human rights considerations, thus ruling in his favour at the first hearings; Or whether they will allow that decision to be made after hearing full submissions which may take months or years. Stirling said “I of course, call on Thai judicial authorities to follow accepted standards and to fulfil their obligations under the conventions they have signed respecting human rights and torture and see that in fact, Hakeem’s unfair detention is indeed already a violation of his human rights, and another form of torture he has had to endure. Hakeem, like many others, is facing a cruel, lengthy and unnecessary process that highlights serious flaws in international extradition standards, in that, there are none. Western governments need to assess the extradition standards of their friends and allies, in order to ensure citizens are not at risk of being extradited to countries where they may face human rights abuses, torture or extrajudicial executions. Australia needs to issue urgent travel warnings to citizens and residents to avoid countries like Thailand, who appear to be cooperating with authoritarian Middle Eastern regimes”. Radha Stirling has called on Australia-Thailand Chamber of Commerce business leaders to support Hakeem’s release, FIFA’s support, as well as urgent Interpol reforms, worldwide extradition standards and Williams Formula 1 fans to avoid the Bahrain hosted race in March. #SaveHakeem #IPEXReform #IPEX #FIFA #Thailand #Australia #AFP #WilliamsF1 #Bahrain #Extradition #Interpol #InterpolAbuse
- Debt persecution in UAE likely to worsen in 2019
Slow economic growth in the UAE connected with lower oil prices, and the property market’s consistent failure to live up to expectations, alongside recent increases in lending by the major Emirates’ banks, is creating conditions for a perfect storm of debt persecution for expats and foreign business owners in the UAE. "When we see the economic indicators coming out of the UAE at the moment, it is immediately worrisome because the country has a policy of waging war on debtors whenever the economy slows down,” warns Radha Stirling, CEO of Detained in Dubai. “Doing business in Dubai for small to medium size companies is getting more difficult and more costly, and it is often necessary to depend on loans and other forms of financing to survive. Financial analysts are anticipating higher incidences of default in 2019 than in previous years; and in the UAE, this inevitably becomes a criminal matter.” Stirling says that failure to strictly comply with the repayment schedule on a UAE bank loan can result in prosecution and jail time; and the same applies to bounced cheques. “For Westerners, the way the UAE treats debts and bounced cheques is incomprehensible. A business owner can find themselves detained, their passport confiscated, and deprived of their ability to work; all because a creditor has filed a police complaint against them over a bounced cheque or delayed loan payment. Oftentimes, people and companies are merely the victims of circumstances beyond their control, or even the victims of the government’s own poor economic management; but they are nevertheless persecuted for what is understood everywhere else to be the normal ups and downs of running a small business; and their whole company ends up collapsing.” The UAE government has been pumping billions of dollars into local banks in recent years to keep them afloat after rampant defaults on small business and personal loans, and analysts are predicting the trend to only worsen over the coming year. “It isn’t surprising that the government has to artificially create liquidity in the banks,” Stirling says, “Because the UAE’s ruthless approach to debt collection literally makes it impossible for debtors to repay what they owe. The aggressive collection agency tactics used in the UAE would be deemed criminal harassment in the West; clients have come to us who have even had their families threatened by collection agents. The banks are so belligerent that their methods often cost people their jobs. And, obviously, criminalising debt as the UAE does is entirely counterproductive; people cannot earn money in prison to repay a loan.” Stirling explains that leaving the UAE with a plan to repay a debt from abroad is also hindered by the UAE’s frequent use of Interpol. “Exiting the UAE while having a debt or bounced cheque case will make a person a fugitive in the eyes of the government, and they are very likely to have their names submitted to Interpol and be subjected to a Red Notice,” she cautions, “The UAE is the top abuser of the Interpol system, and we have seen hundreds of clients’ lives and livelihoods devastated by the effects of an Interpol listing. While we are able to apply for removal from the Interpol database, there is nothing that can be done to undo the damage the listing can cause.” With loan defaults expected to rise this year in the UAE, and with no incentive by banks to self-correct in their lending practices due to unlimited cash injections by the government, Stirling advises expats and business owners to be wary. “The UAE makes it dangerously easy to get access to credit, but it is even easier to run into financial difficulties. It is important to seek professional advice and the intervention of a debt negotiator the moment any problems arise that might result in late or non-payment of a debt, and in the case of a bounced cheque. The longer situations like this go unaddressed, the more dramatically the UAE will escalate them, and the consequences can be catastrophic.” Detained in Dubai has worked on a number of high profile instances of debt persecution over the past 1-2 years; US officials intervened in the case of their citizen David Oliver, who was being kept in Dubai despite suffering mental and physical health problems. British national, Jonathan Castle is still being prevented from returning to the UK and prevented from working, leaving him in a situation where he will never be able to resolve his debts. Meanwhile, a string of expats have been wrongfully placed on Interpol’s red notice database, including Steven Williams who was arrested in Mallorca, Spain and a British woman arrested in Italy over a 15,000 Euro credit card debt.
- Hakeem Al Araibi and the Pressing Case for Interpol Reform
Radha Stirling, an international extradition expert and CEO of Detained in Dubai, commented that “in 2015, Interpol announced that they would not consider any listing request pertaining to an asylum seeker or refugee requested by the country from which they had fled. Thus, Bahrain’s request for a Red Notice against Araibi should have been initially rejected. It is Interpol’s responsibility to ensure that their rules are adhered to, especially regarding Red and Blue Notices. Araibi is a refugee who was granted asylum by Australia. According to Interpol’s internal protocols, he should have been immune from a Red Notice request by Bahrain.” Countries such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates constantly misuse Interpol as a means for debt collection, even though private financial disputes fall beyond Interpol’s mandate. Gulf countries use the threat of a Red Notice to extort debtors often, even when they have been making payments or negotiating with creditors. The GCC continues to attempt and force them to capitulate with the demands of local business partners under the threat of an Interpol listing. When individuals apply for removal of such listings, they are usually granted on the grounds that they do not meet Interpol’s criteria. full article available at albawaba.com
- Leicester man held in Dubai for rude gesture might lose his UK job
“God knows why the UAE wanted to list me with Interpol, but it can't have been for any pleasant reason.” Mr Mukadam faced jail after being accused of “offensive and insulting behaviour for making an obscene gesture while on a visit to Dubai in February. He was driving a hire car when the alleged incident happened. He said: “I pulled over and they were screaming at me. I stuck my finger up and drove off and thought nothing of it.” However, offensive gestures are considered a public obscenity crime in Dubai and this led to legal action. Mr Mukadam, who was on his way to the airport at the time, headed back to the UK, but on a return visit to the United Arab Emirates, authorities caught up with him and he was arrested. Radha Stirling, CEO of Detained in Dubai, a UAE justice group, said that abuse of Interpol has been a long standing tactic of the UAE, one of Interpol's largest voluntary cash contributors." Full article available at: LeicestershireLive
- UAE drops Interpol alerts against debt ‘skippers’
The UAE has removed most of the ‘red notices’ issued to Interpol to try and track down suspects who ‘skipped’ the country due to fraud and financial crimes. The number of notices issued by the government - which are an official request to all Interpol’s 188 members to arrest those suspected of criminal activity - has dropped from over 200 by the end of 2010 to 47 in March this year. Many of the notices that appear to have been cancelled by the UAE related to fraud, and have been linked with legislation that deems bounced cheques and some business failures a criminal matter. An unknown number of expatriates ‘skipped’ the UAE as a result of the financial crisis, while reports suggested in 2007 that as many as 40 percent of the inmates in Dubai Central Prison were there for failing to repay bank loans. The Gulf region’s consumer credit rose by 460 percent between 2002 and 2008 to reach US$151bn. According to Interpol’s online records, only one British national is now the subject of UAE-requested ‘red notice’. Christopher Lockwood, aged 64, is wanted in connection with the high-profile assassination of a Hamas leader in Dubai in 2010. Most of the other existing notices issued by the UAE are related to crimes such as murder and manslaughter. There are still two notices related to ‘banking/financial fraud’ and three related to ‘fraud’. Local officials are currently working on a draft of the UAE’s first ever bankruptcy law, which is likely to be completed by the end of the year. “I am pleased for those who can finally live without the fear of being arrested and possibly extradited to the UAE for matters most countries consider civil,” Radha Stirling, a British lawyer and founder of the ‘Detained in Dubai’ support group, told Arabian Business in an email statement. “We hope that this move will improve the credibility of the other UAE-issued Interpol notices for more serious crimes and we can now focus on negotiating with banks to repay debts, rather than extradition hearings.”











