Search Results

Biden sexual assault victim, Tara Reade, has filed a civil rights complaint against the FBI for intimidation, harassment, unlawful surveillance and the weaponization of the justice system that resulted in her need to seek asylum abroad. The explosive action supports and highlights the kind of weaponization we have seen over the past several years against anyone deemed a political risk to Joe Biden. Attorney, Dr Jonathan Levy, said “Tara Reade was sexually victimized by then Senator Joseph Biden in 1993. Her case was suppressed by Congressional investigators to protect Senator Biden and the records sealed. When she spoke out again in 2019, she was immediately subject to an ongoing FBI Operation to re-victimize her a second time. The FBI Operation was opened for the specific purpose of unlawfully intimidating, harassing, surveilling, and discrediting Tara and arresting her. “The Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted an ongoing operation against Tara in order to silence and surveil her and if possible, falsely arrest her for criminal activities. As a result of the FBI operation, Tara was targeted by a federal grand jury and a California criminal investigation. Tara fled the United States earlier this year joining other Biden whistleblowers, including Gal Luft, who have become targets of federal investigations. “The complaint seeks an investigation of FBI practices which target Biden family whistleblowers for exercise of their First Amendment right to free speech, copies of all information about Tara obtained through unconstitutional surveillance, search, and seizure tactics and an expungement of her FBI files.” Tara Reade fights FBI & DOJ over weaponization When Senate aide, Tara Reade, spoke out in 2019 about Joseph Biden’s sexual assault against her, she never expected she would be revictimized by justice departments that should have been there to protect her, not to target her. Tara was one of eight women to come forward with complaints against Biden, but her allegations were the only ones corroborated by a contemporaneous reporting event at the time of the incident. Over the past several years, we have seen unprecedented instances of the FBI and DOJ being weaponized against those deemed “political opponents” of the democrat party and President Biden. Tara Reade, despite being a lifelong democrat voter, is one of those targets, but she vows to fight back and help other victims of weaponization. Tara and her legal team claim the FBI and others have committed multiple violations of constitutional and statutory law as law enforcement bodies, disinformation and that intimidation campaigns were activated against her with threats to her life and freedom so grave that she was forced to seek asylum in another country due to her status as a female survivor of sexual assault. Tara was subjected to threats, intimidation, and coercion due to her perceived political views through the lens of the Russia collusion hoax as an opponent of President Biden and supporter of Russia.  Due Process International founder and spokesperson for Tara, Radha Stirling, reminds us that, “Russian collusion allegations have been the benchmark of disinformation campaigns against individuals deemed political risks by the Democrat party, including the infamous President Trump Russia Hoax. This appears to be the standard playbook when facing a potential threat to voter recruitment. Rather than addressing the issues directly and ethically, censorship, disinformation campaigns, slander, intimidation and serial abuse of the justice system have become ‘go to’ public relations solutions." “We’ve seen how the justice department, private companies and especially social media outlets, have been abused by politicians to the extent that a weaponization committee was established. History shows us that unlawful surveillance by government agencies against citizens is standard practice and even worse than that, the House Intelligence Committee’s Section 702 Reform Bill has sought to legalize and legitimize this surveillance. “Tara’s actions expose major violations of constitutional and statutory laws that will support numerous other victims of weaponization. Only through such brave legal actions will these unlawful and unethical practices be eliminated”. Biden accuser Tara Reade sues FBI RT World News - Tara Reade says she was targeted for retaliation after speaking out in 2019 about a sexual assault by then-presidential candidate Joe Biden. Read More www.dueprocess.international - radhastirling.com - Phone: +447309114195 Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Interpol Red Notice https://www.interpolrednotice.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/radhastirling Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / Press queries: press@detainedindubai.org Phone: +447309114195 WhatsApp: Click here

Irish citizens face wrong arrests and extradition to a country notorious for human rights abuses if extradition treaty is agreed. The possibility of Ireland entering into an extradition treaty with the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has raised concerns from leading expert Radha Stirling, CEO of Detained in Dubai and Due Process International, and among human rights advocates and legal analysts. The treaty could lead to Irish citizens being extradited to the UAE, a country that has the death penalty, documented human rights abuses, extremely substandard legal due process, and a history of seeking extradition over civil matters and financial disputes, as well as over political vendettas. “Any extradition treaty with the UAE by Ireland must include clauses and protections against wrongful deportations and abuse of extradition mechanisms to protect Irish citizens from being unfairly subjected to UAE jurisdiction, particularly for alleged crimes that are not criminal under Irish law,” warned Stirling. The issue of extradition has come to the fore in recent years, with the case of Daniel Kinahan, a Dublin-based alleged gangster who has been linked to a number of high-profile crimes. The UAE has been a safe haven for Kinahan, who has been living in the Gulf State for several years. However, the UAE's recent decision to take action against the Kinahan cartel raises the prospect of its leaders being extradited to Ireland or another EU country. Garda sources believe that their extradition to Ireland or another European country was "not impossible," even though no extradition treaty exists between the UAE and the Republic. While the prospect of Kinahan's extradition may be welcomed by some, it raises concerns about the potential impact of an extradition treaty with the UAE on Irish citizens. Stirling explained, “The UAE has a poor human rights record, and there have been numerous reports of torture, arbitrary detention, and unfair trials. The country's legal system is opaque, and there are serious concerns about the lack of due process and the use of confessions obtained through torture. There have also been reports of political vendettas and the use of extradition as a tool to silence critics. “Even without extradition agreements, the UAE is a habitual abuser of the Interpol Red Notice system; frequently pursuing foreign nationals abroad over private business disputes, essentially to bully them and extort money by subjecting them to the threat of arrest under international warrants. They have pursued journalists, dissidents, and individuals accused of posting negative opinions of the UAE online. An extradition treaty, if it is not carefully crafted, would potentially expedite wrongful deportations over entirely illegitimate charges against Irish citizens, or others living under Irish jurisdiction.” Ireland has a long history of promoting human rights and has been a vocal critic of countries that violate these rights. An extradition treaty with the UAE could undermine Ireland's reputation and send the wrong message to other countries that are considering similar treaties, Stirling cautioned. “Ireland must consider the potential impact of an extradition treaty with the UAE as a country that upholds human rights and the rule of law,” She said, “It is worth noting that the UK rejects extradition to the UAE because of serious human rights violations in that country. While the Republic of Ireland considers an extradition agreement as a tool for pursuing criminals in the UAE, officials must be cognizant of the fact that any such treaty carries the implication of validating the UAE’s criminal justice system; as the expectation will be that the treaty would necessarily be reciprocal. This is inherently problematic, since the UAE classifies matters as criminal which neither Ireland,nor the EU, nor any advanced legal jurisdiction regard as such. Furthermore, Ireland would be potentially agreeing to extradite suspects sought by the Emirates who have been charged by means of a dramatically flawed investigative process, with evidentiary standards far below international norms. “Any extradition treaty with the UAE by Ireland must contain provisions that protect against this sort of abuse. This should include safeguards against the death penalty, guarantees of fair trials, and the right to legal representation, no extraditions based on absentia convictions, and so on. The treaty should also ensure that Irish citizens are not extradited to the UAE for alleged crimes that are not criminal under Irish law. “In their pursuit of justice against organised crime suspects in the UAE, I would strongly urge the government of Ireland to proceed very carefully in drafting an extradition agreement. A treaty must not become a vehicle for delivering innocent people into UAE custody in exchange for delivering the guilty into Irish custody.” ‘Denmark Faces Human Rights Issues over UAE Extradition Treaty’ says Expert Due Process Newsroom & Media Centre Radha Stirling has successfully lobbied Australian Parliament to include human rights provisions in their extradition treaty with the UAE, appeared for the defence as an expert witness in several high profile extradition cases and has worked tirelessly to remove wrongfully listed clients from Interpol’s database. She has led the call for greater Interpol transparency and reforms to end abuse by an emerging “authoritarian nexus” which misuses the Interpol Red Notice system to circumvent due process. Home | IPEX Reform Interpol & Extradition Reform, Expert Witness, Interpol Removal, Crisis Management, Legislative & Government Advisory Read More Home | Interpol Red Notice Interpol Red Notice by veteran expert Radha Stirling Read More Radha Stirling CEO at Due Process International (+44 7 309 114 195) Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Interpol Red Notice https://www.interpolrednotice.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/radhastirling Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / Phone: +447309114195 WhatsApp: Click here

Tara Reade granted safe haven in Russia Tara Reade, after more than three years of intimidation, harassment, and persecution by both individuals and institutions in the United States due to her allegations against Joe Biden, has been granted asylum in the Russian Federation. Ms Reade also announced she has received additional intelligence that she would have been detained in Seattle had she not made the decision to remain in Russia. After careful consideration and evaluation of all options available to her, Ms. Reade made the decision to seek asylum in Russia based on concerns for her personal safety, well-being, and the protection of her rights. She expressed her gratitude for the Russian government's willingness to provide her with a safe haven and ensure her security. Obviously, this was a tremendously difficult and painful decision, but circumstances forced it upon her. Tara Reade is about deflection, not defection’ Tara Reade, the former congressional aide to then-Senator Joe Biden; who has accused the American president of sexual assault did not “defect” to Russia. Due Process Newsroom & Media Centre It is essential to clarify that the decision to grant asylum to Ms. Reade is solely based on the assessment of her individual ordeal and the Russian government's commitment to protect those facing potential risks in their home countries. The country's asylum policies adhere to international legal standards and principles, ensuring that those who genuinely require protection are provided with a secure environment. Approval of asylum was not politically motivated and should not be understood as a reflection of current relations between the US and Russia, but rather a reflection of the real risks Tara Reade faces in the United States. Tara Reade's case has been carefully evaluated by the relevant Russian authorities, who have determined that her claims and the surrounding circumstances warrant the provision of asylum. Anyone who is familiar with what Ms. Reade has endured since going public with her allegations against Joe Biden in 2019, and the threats to her safety today, will recognise that asylum in her case is entirely justified. Ms. Reade's decision to seek asylum in Russia should not be viewed as an endorsement of the Russian government, of Russian policy, or of Vladimir Putin; nor should it be viewed as an act of disloyalty to her country. Had she been anywhere else in the world when she was alerted of the threats to her safety, Ms. Reade would have appealed for protection wherever she was. She did not choose this situation, she only chose to not remain silent about the abuse and persecution she suffered, and powerful figures in the United States chose to put her in this dilemma as a result. Tara Reade Interpol Red Notice Statements from Tara Reade's representatives. Due Process Newsroom & Media Centre In the America Tara Reade grew up believing in, the America she worked for as a congressional staffer and campaign worker; she would not be required to keep silent about the abuse of power, about the personal corruption and criminality of political leaders, or about the weaponization of government to persecute critics and whistle-blowers. She would not have to choose between her safety and telling the truth. In the America she believes in, telling truth to power is a public service; it does not make you public enemy number one. She still believes in that America today, but unfortunately, as an aspiration, not a reality. As Ms. Reade struggles to reconcile with her new environment, we encourage all parties involved to respect her privacy and allow her the space to rebuild her life. We also urge media outlets and the public to consider the broader implications of her case for issues such as accountability, survivor rights, and the importance of fostering a culture that supports open dialogue and meaningful discussions on sensitive matters. Ms. Reade extends her sincere appreciation to the Russian government for their commitment to providing a safe haven for those in need, and for not politicising her asylum request. We hope, but do not expect, that the United States and the American media will adopt a similarly objective stance. In conclusion, we reiterate that Tara Reade has sought and been granted asylum in Russia based on her individual circumstances. We hope that her journey towards rebuilding her life can be met with understanding, compassion, and the acknowledgment of the importance of providing a secure environment for those who genuinely require it. Radha Stirling CEO at Due Process International Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Interpol Red Notice https://www.interpolrednotice.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/radhastirling Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / Phone: +447309114195 WhatsApp: Click here

An Australian man celebrated his freedom last week when Radha Stirling, an Interpol and Extradition expert who founded the organisations Due Process International and IPEX (Interpol & Extradition) Reform, broke the good news that his Red Notice had been deleted. Radha Stirling, CEO at IPEX (Interpol & Extradition) Reform IPEX seeks to advise, lobby, and achieve urgently needed reforms to Interpol The Australian man had been charged in Qatar over a bounced cheque that was forged without his knowledge, approximately a year after he left the country. He neither issued the cheque to anyone prior to his departure, nor was he aware of its source. However, bouncing a cheque in Qatar is illegal and warrants a prison sentence. He learned of the Red Notice when was first arrested in Prague. He was jailed for five weeks and subjected to lengthy extradition proceedings which he ultimately won. SPOTIFY: Qatar Interpol Red Notice for Bounced Cheque - REMOVED Stirling made submissions to Interpol on his behalf, explaining “My client was arrested in May 2022 in Prague on the basis of the Red Notice, and only then learned of the existence of a forged cheque in the amount of $37,000, apparently involving the Qatar National Bank (QNB). During his detention and extradition proceedings, neither he nor his lawyer were ever provided evidence of the cheque, nor any details regarding to whom it was supposedly written”. The victim and his family were deeply traumatised by this ordeal, and have suffered considerable financial detriment. They have even considered legal action against authorities in Prague for his unjust and inhumane detention. “This is not the first time Czech authorities have been exposed to abusive extradition requests from banks in Qatar”, asserts Stirling. “The extradition process itself has been used by Qatar even when they are fully aware that the request is abusive. They have used it as a means to pressure victims into paying money to banks that are not even owed”. No evidence or investigation into the forged cheque was ever made and the circumstances surrounding the Interpol Red Notice remain suspicious. When pushed, Qatar declined to provide evidence to Interpol but the damage has already been done. “My client was unfairly detained, subjected to extradition proceedings and rendered unable to continue in his work or see his children but Interpol accepted the Red Notice without question. They then deleted the Notice, but only after the damage was done. “Qatar has suffered no penalty and Interpol has not compensated my client for his suffering and losses. This abuse of power and proxy expansion of Qatar’s jurisdiction into Western nations cannot continue”. Stirling has long suggested that compensation should be provided to victims of Interpol abuse. “Financial repercussions is the only way to limit abuse.” If you suspect you may be at risk of an Interpol Red Notice, please contact us for confidential, expert advice. Further Information and Resources: New Interpol Prevention Service to combat Red Notice Abuse Due Process Newsroom & Media Centre Interpol Director referred to International Criminal Court A criminal referral has been made to the ICC by human rights group, Due Process International. Due Process Newsroom & Media Centre Safeguarding International Travel: Interpol Prevention In an era where wrongful listings on the Interpol database pose a significant threat to individuals' lives, reputation, and freedom, IPEX stands as a trusted guardian committed to combating Interpol abuse and advocating for institutional reform. Due Process Newsroom & Media Centre INTERPOL PREVENTION Due Process Newsroom & Media Centre Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Interpol Red Notice https://www.interpolrednotice.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/radhastirling Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / Phone: +447309114195 WhatsApp: Click here

A British woman was overcome with tears in a phone call to Radha Stirling, an Interpol and Extradition expert who founded the organisations, Due Process International and IPEX (Interpol & Extradition) Reform. Stirling broke the good news she had been waiting for last week in an emotional call. The woman had been charged in Qatar for non-payment of a debt which had already been arranged and agreed upon through Qatar National Bank (QNB) and her former employer. She only came to learn of the Interpol Red Notice when she was arrested in Pisa, Italy. Italian authorities informed her that the case stemmed from the financial dispute in Qatar, and that they were accustomed to Qatar misusing Interpol as an instrument for debt collection. Authorities deemed the Red Notice abusive and released her, but that action does not result in the removal of the warrant so she called on Stirling, who has been helping delete wrongful Interpol Red Notices since 2008. (Click the image above to be redirected to an online version of "Radha Stirling's Interpol Press Pack FAQ" at Detained in Dubai's main website, or click the link to download a free .pdf copy) In her submissions, Stirling told Interpol, “My client has already suffered detention and legal proceedings in Italy due to her Interpol listing. She has suffered significant emotional hardship, both on the job in Qatar due to bullying and harassment; as well as from her abrupt dismissal in breach of her employment contract. She has made every attempt to resolve her outstanding debt, for which her former employer is legally responsible, and had been informed by QNB representatives that it would be resolved without anything further required from her. Interpol is increasingly being abused by Gulf States such as Qatar and the UAE, even where they know the Notices will not ultimately stand; which is precisely what occurred in this case. Qatar applies minimal checks and balances when listing a party, which has left Interpol’s databases open to abuse by individuals and institutions”. Commenting on the case, Stirling divulged “My client was extremely distressed after being arrested in Italy. Her life has been on hold and it has drastically affected her mental health, as well as her financial and employment situation. She had been desperate to travel for work and had no idea whether she would be arrested again or potentially even extradited. “Banks in the Middle East have been using Interpol as a mechanism for debt collection for years, but the risk is especially heightened since Qatar’s large donations in 2018. “Expats and tourists who have worked in or visited Qatar, must remain vigilant. Qatar’s abuse of Interpol has led to unprecedented arrests of innocent victims during their travels in Europe and further afield. Many of these victims have spent months in prisons while fighting extradition”. If you suspect you may be at risk of an Interpol Red Notice, please contact us for confidential, expert advice. Further resources and related articles: Scottish engineer held in Iraqi prison facing extradition to Qatar released | UK news | The Guardian Brian Glendinning, 43, was contracted to work for BP in Iraq when arrested over an alleged debt owed to the Qatari National BankRead More Interpol Red Notice Abuse - Expert Radha Stirling deletes another two. Stirling removes another two Interpol Red Notices in January Due Process Newsroom & Media Centre New Interpol Prevention Service to combat Red Notice Abuse Due Process Newsroom & Media Centre Radha Stirling, CEO at IPEX (Interpol & Extradition) Reform Stevenson detention ‘an abuse of his rights’ - The Royal Gazette | Bermuda News, Business, Sports, Events, & Community | American woman traumatised after Qatar Interpol warrant Due Process Newsroom & Media Centre Another wrongful Qatari Red Notice deleted Detained in Dubai has secured the removal of another client’s name from the Interpol database Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Interpol Red Notice https://www.interpolrednotice.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/radhastirling Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

Irresponsible lending Every expat knows the story. On any given workday you may receive upwards of five calls from loan and card agents aggressively trying to sell you credit. Westerners are used to banks being cautious when given loans and cards but this is not the case in the Middle East. The highest risk countries are currently the UAE and Qatar. The UAE has a different approach to lending. If you will accept the loan, then they will give it to you. Minimal questions are asked, and even less checks as to your ability to make the payments are made. They don’t need to lend responsibly because they can literally throw you in jail for an unlimited time for missing payments. Even those not jailed are given a travel ban, meaning they can never leave Dubai until the debt is paid in full. Paradoxically, they are not allowed to work in the UAE, because of the police case for the debt. If they can’t work, then how can they pay their debt? With rent needing to be paid a whole year in advance, expensive school fees and the other high financial outlays that come with life in the UAE, most expats give in to the pressure and accept the credit. (To download .pdf version click here) Plans disrupted In general, expats borrow within their ability to meet the repayments. They know the dire consequences for non payment but life can throw curveballs. People are made redundant, fall ill or their circumstances otherwise change, making payment difficult or impossible. In the West, struggling customers would speak to their banks and work out a plan to restructure the loan. In the UAE they pack up quietly in the night and head for safety, fully intending to renegotiate but from outside of the “danger zone”. They want to pay but without a metaphorical gun to their heads. Fury unleashed The banks at this point often shun all pretence of reasonable behaviour. They can refuse to negotiate, instead demanding immediate, full payment of the outstanding loan. They engage UAE based debt collection agents (DCAs) who can threaten, harass (you, your family, your new employers, and even your clients and customers) and make your life a misery. These DCAs even sometimes engage Interpol to chase unpaid loan or credit card debt. The aim is to have the debt victim arrested overseas or extradited back into the clutches of the UAE and jailed until a family member sells a property to pay the outstanding amount. The banks also employ ruthless UK based debt collection agencies, who are actually able to enforce loans that would sometimes not even have been approved in the UK, and apply laws that would not be permitted in our country; Such as a full 15 year statute of limitations, instead of the 6 allowed in the UK. What next? At this point you are treading a tightrope. Not engaging with, or ignoring the UAE creditors can enrage them and cause them to become more and more aggressive. On the other hand, trying to deal with them and show willingness can encourage them to think they have an easy target in their sights. They can turn up the heat, believing that their tactics are about to yield a payoff. Many UAE debt collectors work without a basic wage, and only get paid a percentage of whatever they can persuade a debtor to pay that month. If they think they “smell blood” they can intensify their efforts. Ignoring UK DCAs can allow them legal avenues to gain judgements by default. However, communicating with them opens you up to the possibility of inadvertently saying or doing something that can jeopardise your position legally. Debtors who have left the the Gulf are at significant risk of being subjected to an Interpol Red Notice which can lead to their detention abroad. This risk can be mitigated and steps can be taken to prevent this occurence. So what DO I do? Don’t talk to them, but don’t ignore them seems like contrary advice. To clarify: engagement is essential, but only if you have a solid understanding of the UAE debt universe and international debt law. Also (this is very important), you need nerves of steel. By this we mean, you need to be able to cope with stress and recognise when you are being emotionally manipulated, versus when the threats are real. Unless you have experience in this field it is infinitely better to get help and advice from people who do. Every case is different, so there is no “one size fits all” strategy that can be thrown at every UAE debt case. What you need to do is get your facts straight, including an approximate timeline of events, the amount of banks involved, the amount of total debt, and the amount of separate cards and loans involved. When you have the above information as accurately as you can muster, then get in touch with an organisation like ourselves at Detained in Dubai. We (or an organisation like us) can then help you determine the best path forward, estimate your best outcome and help you prepare to escape the situation with the minimal possible stress and damage to your finances, mental wellbeing, relationships, career and everything else affected by the situation. Detained in Doha is an NGO formed by expert Radha Stirling to assist people who have become victims of injustice in Qatar. Detained in Dubai was founded in 2008 by UAE expert witness Radha Stirling, the international authority on UAE law. Advisory to government, high profile clientele, leading $1bn litigations, PR expert, reputation management, litigation support, crisis management. Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/radhastirling Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

Is USA Today article just media bias or has it been used by the CIA to manipulate public opinion? In 2007, when ex-CIA agent and torture whistleblower John Kiriakou revealed that the CIA regularly plants articles in US media outlets to manipulate public opinion, one of the news outlets he mentioned was USA Today. Unfortunately, this publication does not appear to be making any attempt to rehabilitate its image as an unbiased source of information. In their recent piece about another whistleblower against the abuse of power, Tara Reade; USA Today opted not to speak to Reade directly, nor to her media representative, nor to her lawyer, but instead interviewed not one, but two US intelligence officials for comment, while stating “several former U.S. intelligence officials” had apparently contacted the journal with their opinions about Reade. The article indulges in baseless speculation about Tara Reade’s motives behind her allegations against President Biden – rather than reporting her testimony about what happened to her; it claims that Reade “fled to Russia”– rather than accurately reporting that she visited the country to oversee translation of her book; and overall, the article seeks to create the impression that Reade is either a witting or unwitting asset of the Kremlin -- rather than stating the fact that she is a sexual assault victim who has been viciously maligned by the American media. All the facts that USA Today chose not to report have been made available to the press, however they made the peculiar decision to instead publish the disparaging opinions of American intelligence officials and to litter the article with negative insinuations that do not align with the facts. This, again, constitutes deflection on the part of the mainstream media from the core issue in Tara Reade’s story; i.e., that she has been persecuted in the US for going public with her allegations against then-Senator Joe Biden, and this persecution has left her stranded in Russia, unable to return to the United States with any confidence of her safety. It would be within the realm of objective journalism to investigate both Reade’s accusations against Biden, and her claims of persecution; both of which can be substantiated. It is not objective journalism, however, to instead fabricate baseless suspicions about the motives behind Reade’s claims, or about her presence in Russia; particularly when these suspicions directly contradict her own statements and the facts which have been made available to the press. It goes without saying that any criticism Tara Reade may express regarding the Biden administration and American foreign and domestic policy from a political perspective does not constitute disloyalty to the United States, and falls well within the spectrum of public discourse on these issues. It would be quite ominous to suggest that legitimate criticism of the US government is tantamount to sedition. Tara Reade is an American citizen who deeply loves her country, but she has suffered immensely for speaking out about a very traumatic experience because it involves someone with power. Through no fault of her own, and without any plan to do so, she has been forced to stay in Russia. It is a textbook case of blame-shifting, and of victim-blaming, to cast doubt upon Tara Reade, her allegations, or her motives without so much as talking to her or her representatives; and this is precisely the kind of unfairness Reade has faced over the past four years from the American media which has contributed to her current circumstances. Please contact Radha Stirling with any press queries: Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/radhastirling mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

Statements from Tara Reade's representatives. When Biden sexual assault accuser, Tara Reade, went to Russia to oversee the translation of her book for what was supposed to be a week long visit, she was warned by multiple credible sources, that she would likely be arrested on return to the US and was likely the subject of an Interpol Red Notice. International crime reporting organisation, Interpol, has long been used by member countries for political persecution. The organisation activates Interpol Red Notices which are essentially requests to arrest persons without oversight of evidence. The organisation has long been criticised for misuse by authoritarian regimes as a means to harass, extort or cause the unfair detention abroad of political dissidents, activists and even credit card debtors. “Given the recent warnings that Tara Reade may be subject to an Interpol Red Notice, we have initiated a communication to Interpol for disclosure of any requests against her”, explained crisis manager Radha Stirling, CEO of Due Process International and IPEX (Interpol & Extradition) Reform. “If there is a Notice against her, we hope that the US will take steps to have that Notice voluntarily deleted, now that it has been raised publicly. In the event she is not currently listed, we are lodging preventative documents with Interpol for added protection if the US considers listing her in the future. Tara Reade has legitimate cause for concern and her legal team, including US attorney Dr Jonathan Levy, are investigating sealed grand jury proceedings in California that authorised the disclosure of her private communications and social media interactions. Dr Levy said in a statement: “In the coming days Ms. Reade and her international legal team will be initiating a proffer to Congress outlining her willingness to testify under oath regarding her sexual assault at the hands of President Biden, the ensuing cover up, her motivation for coming forward in the public interest, and the retaliation she has endured. Ms. Reade also seeks unsealing of Senatorial records that she states will affirm that her reports of sexual of abuse were timely reported and before being covered up. “IMs. Reade is currently in Moscow. She will also explain to Congress why she has temporarily relocated and the credible fears of persecution that caused her to make that difficult decision. “IMs. Reade’s legal team will also be initiating Freedom of Information Act requests and taking other measures to document her abuse, the cover up and subsequent retaliation.” Due Process International Foundation An international not for profit organisation focusing on lawful due process and fair trials, human rights and the accountability of law enforcement agencies, governments, corporations and criminals. Home | IPEX Reform Interpol & Extradition Reform, Expert Witness, Interpol Removal, Crisis Management, Legislative & Government Advisory Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

This week, the International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol) removed the name of a British entrepreneur from its Red Notice database, after a successful appeal was launched by IPEX Reform against his wrongful listing. Radha Stirling, founder and CEO of IPEX Reform and Detained in Dubai, said in a statement about the case, “Our client’s removal from Interpol is a great relief for him and his family after the almost decade-long ordeal they suffered because of corruption in Qatar. After starting and operating a successful gym business in Doha, our client was approached by a local investor with promises of support and expansion, only to then have that same investor sabotage the business, force its closure, and fabricate charges against our client to prevent him from pursuing justice. “He was tried and convicted on these false charges in absentia and his name was wrongfully listed with a Red Notice on the Interpol database. His life has been turned upside-down both by the malice of a fraudulent business partner and corruption of the Qatari legal system, but also by the negligence of Interpol itself, which continues to accept Red Notice requests from notorious and habitual abusers of the system, like Qatar and the UAE, without due scrutiny.” Qatar has been widely accused of abusing the Interpol red notice system, particularly in their use of Interpol for civil and financial disputes. “Qatar and other Gulf States, use red notices to target foreign nationals who have fallen out with local officials or businesses,” Stirling explained, “Very often, they have no intention of genuinely pursuing extradition; rather, they just weaponise Interpol as a tactic of harassment and extortion, knowing the massive difficulties a Red Notice causes individuals who are listed. Interpol has allowed itself to be used as an instrument of injustice, with locals in the Gulf invoking it as a threat against foreign nationals to force them into silent capitulation, or to extort money from them. For the overwhelming majority of our clients listed on Interpol by Qatar, their cases involve financial disputes, bounced cheques, or cases in which they themselves were the victims of fraud, embezzlement, or wrongful termination. None of these conform with Interpol’s own rules on data collection, but the Red Notices are issued anyway, without proper vetting.” FAQ | Interpol and Extradition Being listed as an international fugitive with an Interpol Red Notice warrant is one of the most frightening and unexpected occurrences to happen in one's life. You are in no safer hands than Interpol expert Radha Stirling who will help get your life back, your confidence and your reputation. Stirling emphasised that Interpol has a responsibility to ensure that Red Notices are used for legitimate purposes. However, Interpol has been failing to adequately scrutinise Qatari requests, she explained, “Qatar's abuse of the Interpol Red Notice system is a serious concern. It is a violation of the rights of foreign nationals and it undermines the integrity of Interpol. Interpol is quite literally being used to expand the de facto jurisdiction of authoritarian countries that are infamous for their lack of due process, judicial independence, and for their documented human rights abuses. Interpol is accepting Red Notice requests over cases that would not even be considered a crime in most countries, and which – more to the point – violate their own rules.” Gulf Injustice Podcast, (29th May 2023). Stirling lets client know that his Qatar Interpol Red Notice has been deleted Stirling is a leading voice calling for procedural and institutional reforms at Interpol, even establishing an independent organisation dedicated to this purpose, IPEX Reform; which seeks to improve the transparency, effectiveness, and fairness of Interpol and global standards pertaining to extradition. “Of course, we are very gratified that our appeal against this Red Notice was successful,” She said, “But Interpol actually prolonged our client’s ordeal by granting Qatar an extended period of time to present evidence to justify the listing. His name – which never should have been listed in the first place -- should have been deleted from the database months ago, If we had not persistently lobbied Interpol, and were it not for our years of work in this area, Interpol could have extended Qatar’s deadline indefinitely. We are not seeing any substantial improvement in the way they handle these cases; quite the opposite. It seems that Interpol is increasing in its indifference to Qatar’s abuse of the system, and its indifference to the suffering of the innocent people whom they wrongfully list as fugitives.” INTERPOL PREVENTION Stirling suggests that if people who have been the victims of Interpol abuse launch a class action lawsuit against the organisation, perhaps Interpol will begin taking reform more seriously. “Over the course of the past 15 years, we have assisted thousands of individuals who were wrongfully subjected to Red Notices on behalf of countries like Qatar and the UAE; all of whom we got successfully de-listed, essentially confirming that Interpol should have never issued Red Notices against them to begin with. None of these people have ever been compensated for their victimisation, for the hardship, trauma, reputational and financial damage Interpol’s negligence caused them; and Interpol has never been held accountable for these failures. Indeed, Interpol has made little to no progress in ensuring that such failures will not be repeated; on the contrary, we have seen wrongful listings multiply year-on-year. It may well be time to take the international policing organisation to court.” Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

“At this point, UK citizens who lose their money in the Dubai property market could not be blamed for holding British media outlets accountable, ethically if not legally,” says an exasperated Radha Stirling, founder and CEO of Detained in Dubai. She is reacting to the latest article in the UK press touting the UAE as a smart place to invest. “It is truly appalling that these promotional stories never include information about the huge risks involved in Dubai real estate, not to mention the overall dangers foreign nationals face in the UAE. “Dubai's property market has been described as a haven for money laundering, with criminals and terrorists using the market to hide their assets, according to a report by the Center for Advanced Defense Studies,” Stirling explains, “The report identifies some $100 million in suspicious purchases of apartments and villas across Dubai, yet these newspapers shamelessly champion the UAE as a destination for investment. No mention is made of the lax regulatory environment in Dubai, the rampant criminality and fraud, nor are there even stories of British citizens who have lost their life savings because they believed their own media about how smart it is to buy property in the UAE.” Dubai property market a minefield of laundering, scams, and sanctions evasion The Dubai real estate market has long been a popular destination for foreign investors, with its attractive tax and investment incentives, luxurious lifestyle offerings and rapid development. However, Radha Stirling, CEO of Detained in Dubai and Due Process International...Read More Stirling says the negligence of some UK media in promoting investment in Dubai without properly educating investors is a cause for concern. “The UK media has a responsibility to properly inform investors about the risks involved in investing in Dubai, rather than promoting it as a safe and profitable investment destination” she explains, “One of the efforts we have put a great deal of emphasis on is for the government to increase its travel warnings about the UAE, so British citizens will be aware of the risks they face in a country that has the highest percentage of foreigners entangled in the legal system. When the UK press constantly pushes the narratives crafted by the Dubai Media Office and PR firms hired by the UAE to market the country, it just compounds the problem of misinformation and leads to more and more British citizens making uninformed decisions that could put not only their money, but even their freedom in jeopardy.” Is Dubai the new Chelsea? Nick Candy says so — but not everyone agrees So Nick Candy is no longer sweet on London. The property tycoon — who is best known for building the uber-luxe One Hyde Park development in Knightsbridge with his brother, Christian — has let it be known that he no longer cares for the UK capitalRead More Stirling warns that the Dubai property market has long been exposed as a hub for organised crime, with a data leak exposing how criminals and terrorists have been using the market to hide their assets. Reporters identified numerous owners of Dubai real estate who have been accused or convicted of crimes or are under international sanctions. This has led to a situation where investors are putting their money at risk without fully understanding the risks involved. Dubai’s unreal estate market Most people probably believe that Dubai is home to a vibrant and luxurious property market. However, those more familiar with the UAE city-state know that this apparent real estate oasis in the desert can become investment quicksand the moment you sign the dotted line....Read More Detained in Dubai has also found that rich Russians fleeing sanctions are pumping up Dubai's property market. Dubai brokerage Betterhomes found that Russians moved up two places to become the fifth-top buyers of Dubai. Many Russian buyers also make their purchases in cryptocurrency, as several of Dubai's major property firms have started accepting digital currency payments. Anti-corruption activists and lawmakers accuse Dubai of being a hub for dirty money. Kremlin critic Bill Browder has called for the emirate to be put on a financial blacklist, and a group of members of the European Parliament accused the UAE of facilitating money laundering at a grand scale, including in the real estate sector. Stirling wants the UK media to properly warn British citizens that the Dubai property market is a high-risk investment destination, rife with money laundering, sanctions evasion, scams, corruption, unrealistic property valuations, regulatory problems, obstacles to refunds, and the difficulty recouping investments through property rentals due to over-saturation in the market and rent prices. “The Dubai property market needs stronger regulation and enforcement to prevent the city from being used as a hub for dirty money,” Stirling says, “These changes cannot happen as long as the UAE is able to keep the illusion alive that everything is wonderful in Dubai real estate, which they are able to do with the active promotional support of the British media. This is highly irresponsible and any outlets who continue to present a false image of the UAE are ethically culpable for deliberately concealing information about the serious risks investors face in the Emirates.” Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

The Dubai real estate market has long been a popular destination for foreign investors, with its attractive tax and investment incentives, luxurious lifestyle offerings and rapid development. However, Radha Stirling, CEO of Detained in Dubai and Due Process International, warns that investors must be aware of the risks associated with the Dubai property market, particularly relating to money-laundering, sanctions evasion, and other dangers. “There have been several high-profile cases in recent years,” Stirling says, “The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), an intergovernmental body established to combat money laundering, has identified Dubai as a high-risk jurisdiction for money laundering and terrorist financing. The country's lack of effective anti-money laundering measures and weak regulatory environment make it an attractive destination for organised criminal groups to hide illicit funds. “Criminals use the Dubai property market to transfer funds from one location to another, disguise the origin of the funds and invest the proceeds of their criminal activities in legitimate assets. This has only become easier as the major property development companies in UAE began accepting payment in cryptocurrency. The supply of apartments and homes in Dubai far exceeds demand, and property valuations are disconnected from market realities; meaning the real estate sector in the Emirates is quite unambiguously offering properties as instruments for legitimising illicit money. It is an open secret in Dubai.” The lack of effective anti-money laundering measures in Dubai's real estate market can lead to reputational risks for investors, Stirling warns; “If an investor is unknowingly investing in properties linked to organised criminal groups or individuals, it can damage their reputation and expose them to serious legal and financial risks.” Is Dubai the new Chelsea? Nick Candy says so — but not everyone agrees So Nick Candy is no longer sweet on London. The property tycoon — who is best known for building the uber-luxe One Hyde Park development in Knightsbridge with his brother, Christian — has let it be known that he no longer cares for the UK capital To address these concerns, the Dubai government has introduced several measures to combat money laundering in the real estate sector, including the implementation of a beneficial ownership register, stricter know-your-customer requirements and enhanced due diligence measures for high-risk transactions. However, Stirling says, the effectiveness of these measures remains to be seen, and there are still significant challenges in implementing them. “Dubai frequently responds to the concerns of the international community and risk assessment reports by announcing legislation and regulatory safeguards which usually do not amount to anything beyond the announcements themselves,” she explains, “The UAE sees such concerns as essentially PR problems that have PR solutions; not as substantive dangers that need to be addressed through real legal protections and oversight. While they publicise their efforts to combat money laundering, they are simultaneously facilitating the transfers of untraceable cryptocurrencies into the property market, for example. So, ultimately, investors cannot trust that the Dubai government can be relied upon to protect them from criminal operators, and they need to exercise extreme caution.” Another concern, Stirling says, is that wealthy Russians may be using the Dubai property market to evade sanctions. “Since the invasion of Ukraine, and the imposition of US and the European sanctions against Russia, we have seen Russian investment in Dubai real estate skyrocket,” She explains, “Property prices are at their highest level in a decade, largely due to the influx of Russian cash. While they have always been significant investors in the UAE, it is conspicuous that we have seen such a flood of Russian capital coinciding with the sanctions regime, and it is fairly obvious that oligarchs are securing their money by parking it in Dubai villas and luxury apartments. Of course, we cannot verify that this is what is happening, which is exactly what makes it more likely. A well-intentioned investor could purchase a property that had been bought by a sanctioned Russian businessman, and inadvertently find themselves entangled in an international investigation as an accomplice to sanctions evasion.” Capital flight to UAE undermines human rights by Radha Stirling, CEO of Detained in Dubai, Due Process International and host of the Gulf in Justice Podcast Investors in the Dubai real estate market are also at risk of losing their money due to the lack of transparency in the market, Stirling further cautions. “Dubai's real estate market is largely unregulated, with no comprehensive database that tracks real estate transactions, property values or ownership information,” she says, “This makes it difficult for investors to assess the true value of the properties they are interested in and leaves them vulnerable to fraud and scams. “Typically, people buy properties before they are even built, and their value is purely speculative. They may intend to let the properties out to tenants once they are completed, only to find that they cannot charge sufficient rent to cover their mortgage payments. It is also all too common for homebuyers to lay down hefty sums to secure a property in a development which is later cancelled, or one that only ever existed on paper. Refunds are hard enough to obtain from major developers, but it is impossible to get money back from real estate scamsters.” Dubai’s unreal estate market Most people probably believe that Dubai is home to a vibrant and luxurious property market. However, those more familiar with the UAE city-state know that this apparent real estate oasis in the desert can become investment quicksand the moment you sign the dotted line.... As a legal and human rights organisation, Detained in Dubai urges investors to use caution before considering investing in the Dubai real estate market and to conduct thorough due diligence before making any investment decisions. Stirling says, “Investors should work with reputable real estate agents and seek guidance from expert advisors who can help them navigate the risks associated with investing in the Dubai property market. This is a service we have provided countless clients, helping them to avoid potentially devastating financial and legal nightmares. The investment environment in the UAE can be dangerously attractive, but in many ways it is a minefield; entering it without the support of someone who knows the terrain can leave investors penniless or in prison.” The false promise of Dubai’s property sector “I have made peace with the fact that I got scammed out of all my money; but what am I supposed to do now?” So says one South African flight attendant who purchased an apartment in Dubai back in 2006, expressing what hundreds of property investors in the UAE have experi...Read More UAE provides a risky haven for Russian money As the first private jets from Moscow were landing in the UAE, Radha Stirling, CEO of Detained in Dubai and Due Process International, warned that the Emirates would quickly become Russian oligarchs’ preferred sanctions-avoidance destination for their targeted riches. Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195

In 2019, Ali Issa Ahmad, a British football fan, traveled to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to support his team during the Asian Cup. However, his trip turned into a nightmare when he was arrested and allegedly tortured for wearing a Qatar jersey. Now, Mr. Ahmad has been granted permission by the High Court in London to pursue legal action against Maj. Gen. Ahmed Nasser Al-Raisi, the former inspector general of the UAE Ministry of Interior and current president of Interpol, among six other officials. “This lawsuit raises important questions about the responsibilities of state officials and the role of international organizations in promoting human rights and the rule of law,” says Radha Stirling, CEO and Founder of Detained in Dubai, the first organisation to draw attention to Ahmad’s ordeal in the UAE when it occurred, “It will be up to the court to answer these questions, which is progress in and of itself. Perhaps a conclusive legal ruling will finally give weight and substance to the concept of accountability, instead of it just being used as a buzzword by governments and institutions that never actually implement it.” The current case against Al-Raisi is not the first time he has faced allegations of human rights abuses. In 2011, the United Nations Committee against Torture received a report on allegations of torture and ill-treatment in UAE detention centres, with specific reference to Al-Raisi's role in overseeing these facilities. The report stated that "the Committee is concerned about the absence of a response by the State party to the allegations against Maj. Gen. Ahmed Nasser Al-Raisi, former head of the Criminal Investigation Department." UAE General accused of torture now head of Interpol While the position is largely ceremonial, Al-Raisi’s election has raised serious concerns among legal experts and activists globally. More recently, in 2021, the European Parliament adopted a resolution that called for the EU to suspend its cooperation with the UAE's police and intelligence services due to concerns about human rights abuses. The resolution specifically mentioned Al-Raisi's appointment as president of Interpol and called on the organization to review its procedures for appointing officials. Stirling, who is also head of IPEX, an organisation dedicated to Interpol and extradition reform, was a leading critical voice opposing Al-Raisi’s appointment. “This is a man who oversaw policing and detention facilities in the UAE where there is undeniable, exhaustively documented, systemic abuse,” She explains, “Police investigations in the Emirates flout all norms of evidence-gathering, due process, and human and civil rights protections. Forced confessions are routine, beatings, torture, intimidation, arbitrary detention, denial of legal representation; not to mention secret prison facilities where detainees are quite literally disappeared for weeks, months, or even years at a time; all of this occurs in the UAE, and existed under Al-Raisi’s supervision. His appointment as president of Interpol is an outrageous whitewashing of UAE abuse and a devastating blow to Interpol’s credibility” Home | IPEX Reform The UAE has a close relationship with Interpol, some say too close. Over the past 15 years, Stirling says, the UAE has become one of the most frequent abusers of the Interpol system; often using Red Notices as tools of political persecution of critics, and as a weapon to hound and extort foreigners involved in financial disputes in the Emirates. “Our organisation handles more abusive Red Notices issued from the UAE than from any other country,” Stirling says, “They are able to have wrongful Notices issued against innocent foreign nationals without the slightest scrutiny by Interpol; often over trivial business disputes, bounced cheques, or late loan payments. The Emirates uses Interpol as a global debt collection agency and as an instrument for expanding their de facto jurisdiction to impose punishment over private matters that most Interpol member countries do not even classify as crimes.” One conspicuous factor, Stirling explains, is the UAE's funding of Interpol through the Interpol Foundation, a nonprofit organization that provides financial support to Interpol's activities. The UAE is one of the largest donors to the foundation, contributing over $50 million in recent years. “Obviously, this funding has raised concerns about the influence that the UAE has on Interpol's activities and priorities, particularly given the documented human rights abuses in the country,” Stirling says, “There needs to be greater transparency and accountability in the foundation's funding and decision-making processes in order to alleviate these concerns.” The fact that the current president of Interpol is facing legal action for alleged complicity in human rights abuses only erodes Interpol’s credibility further. If Al-Raisi is found to be complicit in human rights abuses, it will potentially damage Interpol's reputation beyond repair and destroy the international community’s faith in the organization's commitment to human rights and the rule of law. Stirling suggests that the Ahmad case also has broader implications for the UK's foreign policy and its relationship with the UAE. The UK has been widely criticized in the past for its close ties with the UAE, promoting Dubai as a safe tourist destination without adequately warning British citizens about the risks they face from an abusive legal system; accepting billions of dollars in Emirati investment in vital British infrastructure, and the UK’s support for the UAE’s military intervention in Yemen. “If the UK fails to take appropriate action in response to the allegations of human rights abuses against Ahmad and other British citizens,” Stirling says, “It risks sending a message that it is willing to tolerate such abuses in exchange for economic or political benefits.” The Ahmad case highlights the ongoing human rights abuses in the UAE which Stirling’s organisation has long campaigned against, and draws attention to the need for greater accountability and justice for victims. “The case against Al-Raisi is just one example of the broader pattern of abuses in the country,” She explains, “We have represented thousands of victims of UAE abuse over the past 15 years, and while we have consistently been able to successfully secure their freedom and resolve their issues, when it comes to compensation for their suffering and accountability for those responsible; there has always been a stonewall against this kind of redress. It is essential that state officials are held accountable for human rights violations committed by their subordinates, particularly in cases where the abuses are systematic or widespread; this case can go a long way to ensuring that Emirati officials will be held responsible for the pervasive abuses that are normalised in the institutions they oversee. We have always viewed this as a prerequisite for the overall rehabilitation of the legal system in the UAE, and the broader Gulf region. Impunity is what perpetuates abuse and prevents systemic reform. Hopefully this case will help make the changes in the UAE and in Interpol that we have always worked to achieve, and it will open the door for thousands of other victims to finally receive justice.” Detained in Dubai: http://www.detainedindubai.org Detained in Doha: https://www.detainedindoha.org Radha Stirling: http://www.radhastirling.com CLAN - Crypto Legal Advocacy Network: https://www.bitclan.org/ Due Process International: http://www.dueprocess.international IPEX - Interpol & Extradition Reform & Defence Experts: https://www.ipexreform.com/ Podcast: http://www.gulfinjustice.news Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/detainedindubai YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/detainedindubai Live news and updates on Telegram: https://t.me/stirlingnews mail: info@detainedindubai.org / WhatsApp/phone +447309114195